State v. Vazquez, 875 A.2d 544 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Vazquez, 875 A.2d 544 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“need not engage in a private versus public analysis, as the determination of the discretionary versus ministerial issue is dispositive”
48 citation events (48 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Torres v. Department of Correction (connsuperct, 2006-02-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Torres v. Department of Correction
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2006 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
need not engage in a private versus public analysis, as the determination of the discretionary versus ministerial issue is dispositive
cited Cited "see" Alterisi v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mozell v. Commissioner of Correction, 87 Conn. App. 560, 562 , 867 A.2d 51 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 934 , 875 A.2d 543 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Vazquez v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Vazquez, 87 Conn. App. 792 , 867 A.2d 15 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 934 , 875 A.2d 544 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Stratford Police Dept. v. Board of Firearms Permit Examiners
Conn. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. DiPaolo, 88 Conn. App. 53, 59 , 868 A.2d 98 (‘‘[t]he various states have different [penal] laws that reflect their people’s judgments’’), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 935 , 875 A.2d 544 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Martinez (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
“When an allegation is made . . . that a venire panel has been tainted, voir dire itself provides a means to uncover bias. ” (Emphasis added.) Id., 248 ; see also State v. Vazquez, 87 Conn. App. 792, 805-806 , 867 A.2d 15 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 934 , 875 A.2d 544 (2005); State *173 v. Malave, 47 Conn. App. 597, 606 , 707 A.2d 307 (1998), aff'd, 250 Conn. 722 , 737 A.2d 442 (1999) (en banc), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1170 , 120 S. Ct. 1195 , 145 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. DeJesus (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 35 (1999); see also State v. Vazquez, 87 Conn. App. 792, 796 , 867 A.2d 15 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 934 , 875 A.2d 544 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Spear v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
In Kostrzewski , we held that the “compact does not violate the equal protection clause of the United States or Connecticut constitutions”; Kostrzewski v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, supra, 52 Conn. App. 342 ; because the “ [participation in the alcohol education program in Connecticut is not a right, it is a discretionary disposition”; id., 340 ; and the “state has a legitimate interest in highway safety and a responsibility to protect its citizens from those who would drive on its roads while under the influence of alcohol . . . .” Id., 342 ; see also State v. DiPaolo, 88 Con…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ANDERSON VAZQUEZ
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 4, 2005.
875 A.2d 544
Martin Zeldis, public defender, in support of the petition., Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 792 (AC 24262), is denied.