Tuchman v. State, 883 A.2d 1252 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Tuchman v. State, 883 A.2d 1252 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
68 citation events (68 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Madison (connappct, 2009-08-11)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Madison
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Straub, 90 Conn. App. 147, 151 , 877 A.2d 866 (using telephone known to be used frequently in drug sales, watching for cars for fifteen minutes and entering car after speaking to driver provided reasonable and articulable suspicion), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 927 , 883 A.2d 1252 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Braham v. Newbould (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cf. Chance v. Armstrong, supra, 703 (plaintiff had alleged sufficiently serious con- dition, where as a result of inadequate dental care, he alleged to have ‘‘suffered extreme pain, his teeth deteriorated, and he has been unable to eat properly’’).10 Because the facts alleged by the plaintiff do not state a violation of the eighth amendment, we conclude that the trial court properly determined that the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.11 Accordingly, the court properly dismissed the plaintiff’s federal law claims against the defendants in their individual capaci- ties.12…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mercer v. Strange (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also Tuchman v. State, 89 Conn. App. 745 , 878 A.2d 384 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 920 , 883 A.2d 1252 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Iassogna
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
The test to be applied ... is whether the charge, considered as a whole, presents the case to the jury so that no injustice will result.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Straub, 90 Conn. App. 147, 152-53 , 877 A.2d 866 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 927 , 883 A.2d 1252 (2005); see also State v. Walker, 90 Conn. App. 737, 740 , 881 A.2d 406 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 930 , 883 A.2d 1252 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Norman TUCHMAN et al.
v.
STATE of Connecticut et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2005.
883 A.2d 1252
Published

Kenneth A. Votre, New Haven, in support of the petition.

David H. Wrinn, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89[*1253] Conn.App. 745, 878 A.2d 384 (2005), is denied.