Com. v. Minnich, 885 A.2d 41 (Pa. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Com. v. Minnich, 885 A.2d 41 (Pa. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Howard, R. (pasuperct, 2020-09-11)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Howard, R.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Lukowich, 875 A.2d 1169, 1173 (Pa.Super. 2005), appeal denied, 584 Pa. 706 , 885 A.2d 41 (2005) (reiterating that where evidence exists that defendant committed crime, knew he was wanted, and fled or concealed himself, such evidence is admissible to establish consciousness of guilt).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Ferrara, D.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ferrara, 885 A.2d 41 (Pa. 2005).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Mickens, R.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Lukowich, 875 A.2d 1169 , - 15 - J-S46004-15 1173 (Pa. Super. 2005) (citation omitted), appeal denied, 885 A.2d 41 (Pa. 2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Melton, K.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
We are mindful that [p]robable cause does not require certainty, but rather exists when criminality is one reasonable inference, not necessarily even the most likely inference. . . . [W]hile an actual violation of the [Motor Vehicle Code] need not ultimately be established to validate a vehicle stop, a police officer must have a reasonable and articulable belief that a vehicle or driver is in violation of the [Motor Vehicle Code] in order to lawfully stop the vehicle. . . . -5- J-A22039-15 Spieler, supra at 1275 (citations and quotation marks omitted). “[The] potential danger of causing an a…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COM.
v.
MINNICH.
488 MAL (2005).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 21, 2005.
885 A.2d 41
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.