green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
18.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case ·
…pursuant to 75 pa.c.s. 6308(b), a police officer may stop a vehicle anytime the officer possesses reasonable suspicion of a motor vehicle violation.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Com. v. Robertson, W., Jr.
new theories ordinarily cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Com. v. Morales-Castro, A.
(2×)
pursuant to 75 pa.c.s. 6308(b), a police officer may stop a vehicle anytime the officer possesses reasonable suspicion of a motor vehicle violation.
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Bell, M.
See Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094 , 1098 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2008) (new legal theories cannot be raised for first time on appeal); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Bell, M.
See Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094 , 1098 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2008) (new legal theories cannot be raised for first time on appeal); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Campbell, G.
See Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094 , 1098 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2008) (new legal theories cannot be raised for first time on appeal); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Mickens, R.
See Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094 , 1098 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2008) (new legal theories cannot be raised for first time on appeal); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Ray, L.
See Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094 , 1098 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2008) (new legal theories cannot be raised for first time on appeal); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a).
cited
Cited "see"
Total Home Care and Inspection v. Carlevale, P.
See Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094 , 1098 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2007), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2008) (new legal theories cannot be raised for first time on appeal); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Williams, G.
See Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094 , 1098 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2008) (new legal theories cannot be raised for first time on appeal); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Milton, C.
See Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094 , 1098 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2007), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2008) (new legal theories cannot be raised for first time on appeal); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a). - 10 - J-S40002-17 this subchapter, an issue is waived if the petitioner could have raised it but failed to do so before trial, at trial, during unitary review, on appeal or in a prior state postconviction proceeding.”) Commonwealth v. Chmiel, 612 Pa. 333, 365 , 30 A.3d 1111, 1129-30 (2011) (where defendant provided no indication as to the time or manner in which he became aware of alleged Brady materi…
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Camp, A.
See Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094 , 1098 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2008) (new legal theories cannot be raised for first time on appeal); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Barker, T.
See Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094 , 1098 n. 3 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2008); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Conigliaro, S.
See Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094 , 1098 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2008) (new legal theories cannot be raised for first time on appeal); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Regustors, D.
See Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094 , 1098 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2008) (new legal theories cannot be raised for first time on appeal); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Dawson, V.
See Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094 , 1098 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2008) (new legal theories cannot be raised for first time on appeal); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a). -8- J-S82031-16 In the instant matter, the only issues raised in Appellant’s PCRA petition were a claim of an illegal sentence and a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Lee-Purvis, M.
See Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094 , 1098 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2008) (new legal theories cannot be raised for first time on appeal); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Lewis, R.
See Commonwealth v. Hilliar, 943 A.2d 984 (Pa.Super. 2008), appeal denied, 598 Pa. 763 , 956 A.2d 432 (2008) (holding probable cause existed to arrest driver for DUI where driver smelled of alcohol and his speech was slurred).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Agarwal, A.
See Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094 , 1098 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2008) (new - 16 - J-A22038-15 legal theories cannot be raised for first time on appeal); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Maldonodo, L.
If at any time during the course of the proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with this rule, the court may order such party to permit discovery or inspection, may grant a continuance, or may prohibit such party from introducing evidence not disclosed, other than testimony of the defendant, or it may enter such ____________________________________________ 3 We reject the Commonwealth’s assertion that recorded prison phone calls are not “electronic surveillance” under Rule 573(B)(1)(g) and that “[Appellee] had equal access to the priso…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Jackson, E.
See also Commonwealth v. Hanford, 937 A.2d 1094, 1099 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied, 598 Pa. 763 , 956 A.2d 432 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Shawver
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Hilliar, 943 A.2d 984 (Pa.Super.2008), appeal denied, 598 Pa. 763 , 956 A.2d 432 (2008) (applying rational basis analysis and rejecting appellant’s equal protection challenge to DUI statute as failing to consider inherent diversity in human physiology to account for differences in blood alcohol content; holding appellant’s elementary classification did not identify suspect/sensitive class or fundamental right); Commonwealth v. Beshore, 916 A.2d 1128, 1134 (Pa.Super.2007), appeal denied, 603 Pa. 679 , 982 A.2d 509 (2007) (holding new DUI law does not affect suspec…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COM.
v.
HASKINS.
v.
HASKINS.
197 EAL (2008).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 9, 2008.
956 A.2d 432
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (3)
Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.