HEINONEN v. Mandracchia, 996 A.2d 277 (Conn. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
HEINONEN v. Mandracchia, 996 A.2d 277 (Conn. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
57 citation events (57 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Coccomo (conn, 2011-11-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Coccomo (2×)
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Tocco, 120 Conn. App. 768, 786 , 993 A.2d 989 (reviewing court may not act as advocate for any party), cert. denied, 297 Conn. 917 , 996 A.2d 279 (2010).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Rizzo (2×)
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Woods, supra, 297 Conn. at 586 , 4 A.3d 236 (defendant's statements "were appropriate and demonstrated that he understood his rights and the court's questions," he "confirmed that he wished to be tried by a three judge court, that he had spoken with defense counsel to discuss this decision, and had an adequate opportunity to do so, that defense counsel had spoken with him about all the issues and possibilities associated with his decision, and that he was sure of his decision to be tried by a three judge court" and defense counsel agreed with defendant's statements); State …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mark Heinonen
v.
James M. Mandracchia Et Al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 24, 2010.
996 A.2d 277
Mark Heinonen, pro se, in support of the petition., J. Kevin Golger, in opposition.
Eveleigh.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 836 (AC 30858), is denied.

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.