green
Positive treatment
7.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2016
2021
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Brown, J.
See Commonwealth v. Konias, 136 A.3d 1014, 1022 (Pa.Super. 2016), appeal denied, 636 Pa. 673 , 145 A.3d 724 (2016) (citing Commonwealth v. Smith, 97 A.3d 782 , - 11 - J-S36033-18 788 (Pa.Super. 2014) (reiterating general rule that trial court, sitting as trier of fact, “is presumed to know the law, ignore prejudicial statements, and disregard inadmissible evidence”)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Bologna, M.
See Commonwealth v. Konias, 136 A.3d 1014, 1022 (Pa.Super. 2016), appeal denied, 636 Pa. 673 , 145 A.3d 724 (2016) (citing Commonwealth v. Smith, 97 A.3d 782, 788 (Pa.Super. 2014) (reiterating general rule that trial court, sitting as trier of fact, “is presumed to know the law, ignore prejudicial statements, and disregard inadmissible evidence”)).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Haynes, N.
See Commonwealth v. Haynes, 144 A.3d 193 (Pa.Super. 2016) (unpublished memorandum), appeal denied, 145 A.3d 724 (Pa. 2016).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Rivera, B.
See Commonwealth v. Konias, 136 A.3d 5 We also do not ascertain a basis in the record for admission of the statement under a different exception to the rule against hearsay. - 14 - J-A30020-16 1014, 1022 (Pa. Super. 2016), appeal denied, 145 A.3d 724 (Pa. 2016) (citation omitted).6 In this case, the properly admitted and uncontradicted evidence of guilt was overwhelming.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Starvis, M.
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Konias, 136 A.3d 1014, 1022 (Pa. Super. 2016) (internal quotations and citations omitted), appeal denied, 145 A.3d 724 (Pa. 2016).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Lucas, W.
See Treiber, 121 A.3d at 461 . - 28 - J-S84025-16 In re J.G., 145 A.3d 1179, 1185 (Pa. Super. 2016) (emphasis added); see also Commonwealth v. Jaynes, 135 A.3d 606, 610 (Pa. Super.) (“A pretrial identification will not be suppressed as violative of due process rights unless the facts demonstrate that the identification procedure was so infected by suggestiveness as to give rise to a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. . . . [W]here a defendant does not show that improper police conduct resulted in a suggestive identification, suppression is not warranted” (emphasis omi…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commonwealth
v.
Philip J. Giunta, II
v.
Philip J. Giunta, II
NO. 157 MAL (2016).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug 10, 2016.
145 A.3d 724
Published
PETITION FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Denied.
12 Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
--------