green
Positive treatment
Trending · 103 recent citers
Quoted verbatim 1×
25.3 score
“here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 48 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In the Interest of: D.I.T.M. Appeal of: S.R.T.
here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: K.K., a Minor
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462, 465-66 (Pa.Super. 2017). - 14 - J-A28041-21 Regardless, even if not waived, such a challenge is without merit.
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Int. of C.L. Appeal of: B.L.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462, 466 (Pa.Super. 2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Int. of: J.W., Appeal of: W.L.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462, 465-66 (Pa.Super. 2017).13 ____________________________________________ 13 We note that, even if Father’s claim were preserved, it would be without merit.
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Int. of: K.M.M., Appeal of: M.M.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011), quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462, 465-466 (Pa.Super. 2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Int. of: L v. Appeal of: J.H.
See In re W.H. , 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied , 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C. , 991 A.2d 884 , 897 (Pa.Super. 2010) ) ("[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived"); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W. , 163 A.3d 462 , 465-66 (Pa.Super. 2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Int. of: L v. Appeal of: J.H.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462 , 465-66 - 19 - J-A07035-19 (Pa.Super. 2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: J.C.W., Jr., a minor, Appeal of: J.C.W.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462, 465-66 (Pa.Super. 2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adoption of B.X.D., Appeal of D.T.M.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 - 15 - J-S63045-18 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462, 465-66 (Pa.Super. 2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
In The Interest of: X.A.Z v. Appeal of: C.B.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (noting that appellate brief which fails to provide any discussion of claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop issue in meaningful fashion capable of review waives the claim); see also Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a)-(b). -7- J-S48031-18 We review cases involving the termination of parental rights according to the following standards.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: L.N.D., a Minor
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011), quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462, 465-466 (Pa.Super. 2017). -4- J.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: Adoption of K.L v. Appeal of: C.R.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also In re M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d 462, 465-66 (Pa.Super. 2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
N.A.H. v. J.S.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 ____________________________________________ 6 We recognize that Mother’s second argument is closely related to her first argument. 7 While Mother raised this issue in her Preliminary Objections to Putative Father’s Complaint, See Defendant’s Preliminary Objections To Plaintiff’s Complaint, 7/18/17, at ¶¶5, 6, which was amended to an Answer, N.T. at 42, Mother failed to address or raise this issue further at the hearing. - 13 - J-S08043- 18 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (P…
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Interest of: I.L.H.L., a Minor
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa. Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adoption of S.R.P., Appeal of: J.P., father
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”). -7- J-S60045-17 In re T.S.M., 620 Pa. 602, 628 , 71 A.3d 251, 267 (2013).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. McClure
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330, 334 (Pa. Super,), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Interest of: Z.Z.B., a Minor
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (stating, “[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”) (citations omitted); (see also Father’s Brief, at 10-14). -5- J-S34032-17 (1) Father has failed or refused to perform parental duties during six-month period before filing petition; (2) in spite of DHS providing Father with services, he is unwilling or unable to remedy causes …
discussed
Cited "see"
Adoption of: A.W.F. etc. Appeal of: J.E.M., father
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
B.A.B. v. J.J.B.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330, 334 (Pa. Super. 2011) (appellate court may question the appealability of an order sua sponte as it implicates the court’s jurisdiction), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
B.A.B. v. J.J.B.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330, 334 (Pa. Super. 2011) (appellate court may question the appealability of an order sua sponte as it implicates the court’s jurisdiction), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
B.A.B. v. J.J.B.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330, 334 (Pa. Super. 2011) (appellate court may question the appealability of an order sua sponte as it implicates the court’s jurisdiction), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
B.A.B. v. J.J.B.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330, 334 (Pa. Super. 2011) (appellate court may question the appealability of an order sua sponte as it implicates the court’s jurisdiction), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
B.A.B. v. J.J.B.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330, 334 (Pa. Super. 2011) (appellate court may question the appealability of an order sua sponte as it implicates the court’s jurisdiction), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Interest of: S.Q.L., a Minor
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011), quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa. Super. 2010) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the interest of: A.S.M.B., a Minor
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa. Super. 2010)) ("[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived."'). -6 J -S06016-17 Termination of parental rights is governed by Section 2511 of the Adoption Act, 23 Pa.C.S.A §§ 2101-2938, which requires a bifurcated analysis.
discussed
Cited "see"
A.S.M. v. E.M.S.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa. Super. 2010)) (“‘[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”’).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: Z.J., a minor, Appeal of: J.W.J.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa. Super. 2010)) (“‘[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any -5- J-S78029-16 discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”’).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of the Adopt of L.K. Appeal of: J.K. father
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa. Super. 2010)) (“‘[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”’). -4- J-S54030-16 present at a termination hearing.
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Interest of: I.B.B., a Minor
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011) (stating that issues are waived if appellate brief fails to provide meaningful discussion with citation to relevant authority), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011); see also generally Pa.R.A.P. 2119(b).
discussed
Cited "see"
D.C.S.-R. v. P.R.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa. Super. 2010)) (“‘[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of (Footnote Continued Next Page) - 16 - J-S21001-16 evidence admitted during the custody hearing that Mother assaulted her ex- husband, nor was there any evidence which proves that Mother continues to “get involved in fights,” as Father suggests.
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Interest of: P.J.W.P., a Minor
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011) (stating, “[w]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived[]”), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011), quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa. Super. 2010). -7- J-S12015-16 Initially, the focus is on the conduct of the parent.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: D.V.M.R., a Minor Appeal of: L.W., Mother
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011) (“where an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived[]”), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011), quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa. Super. 2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Interest of: M.E.R. Appeal of: N.S.R.
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa. Super. 2010)) (“‘[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”’). -4- J-S15015-16 abuse of discretion only upon demonstration of manifest unreasonableness, partiality, prejudice, bias, or ill-will.
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Interest of: Z.R., a Minor
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa. Super. 2010)) (“‘[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”’). -5- J-S10016-16 Initially, the focus is on the conduct of the parent.
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Interest of: A.E.D., a Minor
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa. Super. 2010)) (“‘[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”’). -4- J-S65001-15 by the record.
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Interest of: M.M., a Minor
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa. Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”). -7- J-S38017-15 J-S38018-15 In re T.S.M., 71 A.3d 251, 267 (Pa. 2013) (citations and quotation marks omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Interest of: A.A.A., a Minor
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (quoting In re A.C., (Footnote Continued Next Page) -3- J-S39016-15 We review this appeal according to the following standard: The standard of review in termination of parental rights cases requires appellate courts to accept the findings of fact and credibility determinations of the trial court if they are supported by the record.
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Int. of: A.B., a Minor
See In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884 , -2- J-S49016-15 We consider Mother’s claim mindful of our well-settled standard of review: The standard of review in termination of parental rights cases requires appellate courts to accept the findings of fact and credibility determinations of the trial court if they are supported by the record.
discussed
Cited "see"
DAGES v. Carbon County
See Bd. of Supervisors of Milford Twp. v. McGogney, 13 A.3d 569 (Pa.Cmwlth.2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 644 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (the township board of supervisors were the township solicitor’s clients for the purpose of the attorney-client privilege).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Int. of: N.J., a Minor, Appeal of: B.P.
In fact, she states, “The record confirms that this court and DHS did not notify me of the July 1, 2019 -7- J-A05039-21 Moreover, Maternal Aunt waived any challenge relating to the denial of nunc pro tunc relief as she failed to raise and address this issue in her Rule 1925(b) statement, in the Statement of Questions Involved section of her appellate brief, or the Argument portion thereof.8 See Krebs v. United Refining Co., 893 A.2d 776, 797 (Pa.Super. 2006) (stating that a failure to preserve issues by raising them both in the concise statement of errors complained of on appeal and statemen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Int. of: A.A., Appeal of: A.B.
See Krebs v. United Refining Co., 893 A.2d 776, 797 (Pa. Super. 2006) (stating that a failure to preserve issues by raising them both in the concise statement of errors complained of on appeal and statement of questions involved portion of the brief on appeal results in a waiver of those issues). 13 See Pa.R.A.P. 2101 (stating, “Briefs and reproduced records shall conform in all material respects with the requirements of these rules as nearly as the circumstances of the particular case will admit, otherwise they may be suppressed. . . .); see also In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Interest of: Y.S., a Minor
See Krebs v. United Refining Co. of Pennsylvania, 893 A.2d 776, 797 (Pa. Super. 2006) (stating that a failure to preserve issues by raising them both in the concise statement of errors complained of on appeal and statement of questions involved portion of the brief on appeal results in a waiver of those issues.); see also In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa. Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to devel…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Interest of: L.R.J.P., a Minor
Mother argues that the trial court erred in not granting her motion for separate legal-interests counsel due to evidence ____________________________________________ 797 (Pa.Super. 2006) (stating that a failure to preserve issues by raising them both in the concise statement of errors complained of on appeal and statement of questions involved portion of the brief on appeal results in a waiver of those issues); see also In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Interest of: J.K.A.B., a Minor
“If the factual findings are supported, ____________________________________________ 6 See Krebs v. United Refining Co., 893 A.2d 776, 797 (Pa.Super. 2006) (stating that a failure to preserve issues by raising them in the concise statement of errors complained of on appeal results in a waiver of those issues)(citing Pa.R.A.P. 2116); see also In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to releva…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington, S. v. Hamilton, H.
See Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a); see also In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330, 339 (Pa. Super. 2011) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”) (citations omitted), appeal denied, 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Interest of: J.F.W., a Minor
See Krebs v. United Refining Co., 893 A.2d 776, 797 (Pa.Super. 2006) (stating that a failure to preserve issues by raising them both in the concise statement of errors complained of on appeal and statement of questions involved portion of the brief on appeal results in a waiver of those issues); see also In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C., 991 A.2d 884, 897 (Pa.Super. 2010)) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the iss…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
A.J.B. v. A.G.B. Appeal of: A.M.G.
See Krebs , 893 A.2d at 797 ; see also In re W.H. , 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 611 Pa. 643 , 24 A.3d 364 (2011) (quoting In re A.C. , 991 A.2d 884 , 897 (Pa.Super. 2010) ) ("[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Interest of: M.T. Appeal of: R.T.
See also In re W.H., 25 A.3d 330 , 339 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2011) (holding that “where an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived[]”), appeal denied, W.H. v. L.B., 24 A.3d 364 (Pa. 2011). -3- J-A30021-14 unreasonableness, partiality, prejudice, bias, or ill- will.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PETRINA.
v.
KELLEY; IN RE ESTATE OF KELLEY; IN RE PETRINA;
v.
KELLEY; IN RE ESTATE OF KELLEY; IN RE PETRINA;
238, 239 MAL (2011).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jul 12, 2011.
24 A.3d 364
Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (1)
Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.