green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Metalico Pittsburgh Inc. v. Newman
See Branham v. Rohm and Haas Co., 19 A.3d 1094, 1103 (Pa. Super. 2011) (“This Court is not bound by the decisions of federal courts, other than the United States Supreme Court, ... on a matter of Pennsylvania law”), appeal denied, 615 Pa. 771 , 42 A.3d 289 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
Calkins, M. v. Butz, E.
See Branham v. Rohm and Haas Co., 19 A.3d 1094 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 615 Pa. 771 , 42 A.3d 289 (2012) (stating Superior Court is not bound by decisions of federal courts, other than United States Supreme Court, or decisions of other state courts on matters of Pennsylvania law).
cited
Cited "see"
Arvonio v. PNC Wealth Management
See Branham v. Rome & Haas Co., 19 A.3d 1094, 1111 (Pa. Super. 2011), app. denied, 615 Pa. 771 , 42 A.3d 289 (2012).
cited
Cited "see"
In re McKinney
See Branham v. Rohm & Haas Co., 19 A.3d 1094, 1107 (Pa.Super.2011) appeal denied, 615 Pa. 771 , 42 A.3d 289 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. PECO Energy Co.
See Branham v. Rohm and Haas Co., 19 A.3d 1094, 1103 (Pa.Super.2011) (stating, "common pleas court decisions are not binding on appellate courts [in this Commonwealth]”) (citations omitted), appeal denied, -Pa.-, 42 A.3d 289 (2012).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Thomas
See Branham v. Rohm and Haas Co., 19 A.3d 1094, 1107 (Pa.Super.2011), appeal denied, - Pa. -, 42 A.3d 289 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Genesis Eldercare v. Reliant Osprey Holdings, LLC
Absent the satisfaction of all three prongs of the collateral order test, this Court has no jurisdiction to consider an appeal of an otherwise non-final order. -5- J-A09045-16 Spanier v. Freeh, 95 A.3d 342, 345 (Pa. Super. 2014) (citations and quotation marks omitted); see also Branham v. Rohm and Haas Co., 19 A.3d 1094, 1101 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 42 A.3d 289 (Pa. 2012).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BRANHAM
v.
ROHM AND HAAS CO.; IN RE DOW CHEMICAL CO.
v.
ROHM AND HAAS CO.; IN RE DOW CHEMICAL CO.
289 EAL (2011).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Apr 10, 2012.
42 A.3d 289
Published
Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.