green
Positive treatment
10.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Jewelyette M. (Second Dissent)
See In re Kamari C-L., 122 Conn. App. 815, 830 , 2 A.3d 13 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 927 , 5 A.3d 487 (2010); cf. In re James O., supra, 322 Conn. 649 (clear and convincing evidence is burden of proof for termination of parental rights petition).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Jewelyette M. (Second Dissent)
See In re Kamari C-L., 122 Conn. App. 815, 830 , 2 A.3d 13 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 927 , 5 A.3d 487 (2010); cf. In re James O., supra, 322 Conn. 649 (clear and convincing evidence is burden of proof for termination of parental rights petition).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Jewelyette M. (Second Dissent)
See In re Kamari C-L., 122 Conn. App. 815, 830 , 2 A.3d 13 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 927 , 5 A.3d 487 (2010); cf. In re James O., supra, 322 Conn. 649 (clear and convincing evidence is burden of proof for termination of parental rights petition).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Carlson
See State v. Seekins, 123 Conn. App. 220, 226 , 1 A.3d 1089 (‘‘[t]his court repeatedly has refused to apply the consciousness of innocence principle to jury instruc- tions regarding a consciousness of guilt’’), cert. denied, 298 Conn. 927 , 5 A.3d 487 (2010); see also State v. Holley, 90 Conn. App. 350, 365 , 877 A.2d 872 (‘‘[e]ven in cases in which a defendant has explained his flight, an instruction that flight is circumstantial evidence of guilt need not be accom- panied by a discussion by the court of the benign explanations for flight offered by the defendant’’), cert. den…
cited
Cited "see"
In re Ja-lyn R.
See In re Kamcuri C-L., 122 Conn. App. 815, 824-25, 829-30 , 2 A.3d 13 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 927 , 5 A.3d 487 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Connery v. Gieske
(2×)
It is also well established that "[t]he right to appeal from a decree of the Probate Court is purely statutory and the rights fixed by statute for taking and prosecuting the appeal must be met." State v. Goggin , 208 Conn. 606 , 615, 546 A.2d 250 (1988) ; see also Silverstein v. Camposeo , 122 Conn.App. 338 , 343, 999 A.2d 15 (appeal under § 45a-186 "[cannot be] perfected absent ... strict compliance with all statutory requirements"), cert. denied, 298 Conn. 926 , 5 A.3d 487 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Utica Mutual Insurance Company
v.
Precision Mechanical Services, Inc.
v.
Precision Mechanical Services, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 29, 2010.
Neal L. Moskow, in support of the petition.
Rogers.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 122 Conn. App. 448 (AC 30676), is denied.
ROGERS, C. I., and KATZ, I., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.