People v. Eisenberg, 88 A.D.2d 604 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Eisenberg, 88 A.D.2d 604 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Cosme (nyappdiv, 2013-10-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Cosme
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · confidence medium
The defendant correctly contends that the prosecutor improperly asked him on cross-examination whether a prosecution witness’s testimony was “not true” because it contradicted the defendant’s recollection of events (see People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396, 400 [1981]; People v Lawrence, 4 AD3d 436, 437 [2004]; People v Berrios, 298 AD2d 597, 597 [2002]; People v Leuthner, 216 AD2d 327, 328 [1995]; People v Simms, 130 AD2d 525, 525-526 [1987]; People v Sepulveda, 105 AD2d 854, 857 [1984]; People v Buehler, 104 AD2d 1045, 1045 [1984]; People v Calderon, 88 AD2d 604, 604 [1982]; People v Ochoa…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Cosme
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · confidence medium
The defendant correctly contends that the prosecutor improperly asked him on cross-examination whether a prosecution witness’s testimony was “not true” because it contradicted the defendant’s recollection of events (see People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396, 400 [1981]; People v Lawrence, 4 AD3d 436, 437 [2004]; People v Berrios, 298 AD2d 597, 597 [2002]; People v Leuthner, 216 AD2d 327, 328 [1995]; People v Simms, 130 AD2d 525, 525-526 [1987]; People v Sepulveda, 105 AD2d 854, 857 [1984]; People v Buehler, 104 AD2d 1045, 1045 [1984]; People v Calderon, 88 AD2d 604, 604 [1982]; People v Ochoa…
discussed Cited "see" People v. Ruffule
N.Y. App. Div. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
Although we find that certain comments by the prosecutor on summation were improper (e.g., his reference to jurors as defendant’s "next victims”; see, People v Calderon, 88 AD2d 604 ), they were not so egregious as to deny defendant a fair trial, particularly since the trial court, on more than one occasion, gave cautionary instructions (see, People v Cheek, 168 AD2d 946 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Meurer
N.Y. App. Div. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Having raised, sua sponte, the question of defendant’s capacity to stand trial, and having ordered a CPL article 730 examination, which resulted in conflicting opinions, the court should have conducted a competency hearing, as required by CPL 730.30 (4) (see, People v Armlin, 37 NY2d 167 ; see also, People v Jackson, 88 AD2d 604, 605-606 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Bannerman
N.Y. App. Div. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
This was compounded by cross-examination of defendant concerning his use of aliases during the investigation of offenses about which cross-examination had been precluded pursuant to People v Sandoval ( 34 NY2d 371 ; see, e.g., People v Evans, 88 AD2d 604 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Sandra Eisenberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 3, 1982.
88 A.D.2d 604
Published

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by her brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), imposed October 23, 1981. Sentence affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Rubin, JJ., concur.