Luciani v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc., 548 A.2d 437 (Conn. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Luciani v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc., 548 A.2d 437 (Conn. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
87 citation events (56 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Clinkscales (connappct, 1990-05-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Clinkscales
Conn. App. Ct. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. McNellis, 15 Conn. App. 416 , 420 n.2, 546 A.2d 292 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 809 , 548 A.2d 441 (1988).
cited Cited "see" State v. Holloman
Conn. App. Ct. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. McNellis, 15 Conn. App. 416, 423 , 546 A.2d 292 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 809 , 548 A.2d 441 (1988).
cited Cited "see" State v. Reyes
Conn. App. Ct. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. McNellis, 15 Conn. App. 416, 433 , 546 A.2d 292 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 809 , 548 A.2d 441 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Zapata
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Thus, a defendant is guaranteed the right to be present at any stage of the criminal proceeding that is critical to its outcome if his presence would contribute to the fairness of the procedure.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Kentucky v. Stincer, supra, 745 ; see also State v. McNellis, 15 Conn. App. 416, 432 , 546 A.2d 292 (voir dire of jurors concerning possible jury tampering was critical stage of criminal proceeding), cert. denied, 209 Conn. 809 , 548 A.2d 441 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Root v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
“The judicial doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel are based on the public policy that a party should not be able to relitigate a matter which it already has had an opportunity to litigate.” In re Juvenile Appeal (88-DE), 190 Conn. 310, 318 , 460 A.2d 1277 (1983); see also Gionfriddo v. Gartenhaus Cafe, 15 Conn. App. 392, 402 , 546 A.2d 284 , cert. granted, 209 Conn. 809 , 548 A.2d 437 (1989). * “The doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel protect the finality of judicial determinations, conserve the time of the court, *224 and prevent wasteful relitigation.” Id.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adolph Luciani
v.
The Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 1988.
548 A.2d 437
William F. Gallagher, in support of the petition., Jeffrey J. Mirman and Peter Schwartz, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 15 Conn. App. 407, is denied.