green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Briley
See State v. Flinter, 16 Conn. App. 402, 410 , 548 A.2d 1 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 829 , 552 A.2d 1216 (1988). “[T]he burden [falls] on the defendant to demonstrate that the remarks were so prejudicial that he was deprived of a fair trial and the entire proceedings were tainted.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Chasse, supra, 51 Conn. App. 356 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Clark
See State v. Flinter, 16 Conn. App. 402, 410 , 548 A.2d 1 [cert. denied, 209 Conn. 829 , 552 A.2d 1216 ] (1988).” State v. Sherman, supra, 395-96 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Vega
See State v. Ramirez, 16 Conn. App. 284, 289 , 547 A.2d 559 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 828 , 552 A.2d 434 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Jenkins
See State v. Anderson, 16 Conn. App. 346, 355-56 , 547 A.2d 1368 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 828 , 552 A.2d 433 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Estrada
See State v. Anderson, 16 Conn. App. 346, 357 , 547 A.2d 1368 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 828 , 552 A.2d 453 (1988); State v. Dickson, 10 Conn. App. 462, 466 , 523 A.2d 935 (1987). of marijuana in the wooded area where Anziano was seen to run.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bell
His position is not that the court should have given the instruction he orally requested; see State v. Ramirez, 16 Conn. App. 284, 287 , 547 A.2d 559 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 828 , 552 A.2d 434 (1988); but rather that the question posed to the court by the jury was a question of fact rather than one of law, and that as such the court should not have considered the standard of “sufficiency of evidence.” 5 In effect, the defendant argues that by its question the jury was saying, “We have found, factually, that the defendant was under the influence of drugs, now tell us how that affects hi…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. DeMartin
Practice Book § 4185; see State v. Ramirez, 16 Conn. App. 284, 290 , 547 A.2d 559 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 828 , 552 A.2d 434 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Petion
See, e.g., State v. Anderson , 16 Conn. App. 346 , 357, 547 A.2d 1368 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 828 , 552 A.2d 433 (1988) ; *1003 Levin v. State , 334 Ga. App. 71 , 74, 778 S.E.2d 238 (2015), cert. denied, Georgia Supreme Court, Docket No. S16C0249 (January 11, 2016); **491 Sloan v. State , Docket No. 49A02-1002-CR-195, 2010 WL 4813600 , *2 (Ind. App. November 24, 2010) (decision without published opinion, 937 N.E.2d 938 [Ind. App. 2010] ); State v. Roper , supra, at 898 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Smith
State v. Vega, 48 Conn. App. 178, 185 , 709 A.2d 28 (1998); see also State v. Ramirez, 16 Conn. App. 284, 289 , 547 A.2d 559 , cert, denied, 209 Conn. 828 , 552 A.2d 434 (1988).” State v. Williams, 59 Conn. App. 771, 782 , 758 A.2d 400 , cert, granted on other grounds, 254 Conn. 952 , 762 A.2d 906 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Williams
Indeed, we are mindful that in many cases “a trial court’s awareness of the factual basis for a requested charge . . . [does not constitute] an acceptable alternative to a party’s compliance with the rules of practice.” State v. Vega, 48 Conn. App. 178, 185 , 709 A.2d 28 (1998); see also State v. Ramirez, 16 Conn. App. 284, 289 , 547 A.2d 559 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 828 , 552 A.2d 434 (1988). “[W]hile we would prefer it if the defendant’s counsel had drafted a more thorough request to charge, or if he had made a more specific exception, we will review this claim because the defen…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rodriguez, No. Cr95-234475 (May 7, 1997)
State v. Trine, 236 Conn. 216 , 235 (1996); see also State v. Ortiz, 17 Conn. App. 102 , 103 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 828 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Miguel A. Ortiz
v.
Miguel A. Ortiz
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 6, 1988.
Nicholas P. Cardwell, in support of the petition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 17 Conn. App. 102, is denied.