Schult v. Schult, 675 A.2d 885 (Conn. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Schult v. Schult, 675 A.2d 885 (Conn. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pasik v. United Technologies Corp., No. Cv94 31 33 96 S (Aug. 7, 2002) (connsuperct, 2002-08-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Pasik v. United Technologies Corp., No. Cv94 31 33 96 S (Aug. 7, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Reynolds v. Chrysler First Commercial Corp ., 40 Conn. App. 725 , 730 , 673 A.2d 573 , cert. denied , 237 Conn. 913 , 675 A.2d 885 (1996); Firgeleski v. Hubbell, Inc ., D.N.
discussed Cited "see" McGuire v. Derby Savings Bank, No. Cv97-0056878s (Apr. 24, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp., 229 Conn. 99 , 107 , 639 A.2d 507 (1994). "[S]ummary judgment is ordinarily inappropriate where an individual's intent and state of mind are implicated." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Reynolds v. Chrysler First Commercial Corp., 40 Conn. App. 725 , 731 , 673 A.2d 575 , cert. denied, 237 Conn. 913 , 675 A.2d 885 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Donovan v. Neri, No. Cv97-0140940s (Apr. 24, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp., 229 Conn. 99 , 107 , 639 A.2d 507 (1994). "[S]ummary judgment is ordinarily inappropriate where an individual's intent and state of mind are implicated." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Reynolds v. Chrysler First Commercial Corp., 40 Conn. App. 725 , 731 , 673 A.2d 575 , cert. denied, 237 Conn. 913 , 675 A.2d 885 (1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jewett v. General Dynamics Corp., No. 530943 (May 1, 1997)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1997 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Reynolds v. Chrysler First Commercial Corp., 40 Conn. App. 725 , 673 A.2d 573 , cert. denied, 237 Conn. 913 , 675 A.2d 885 (1996) (where court held that, because plaintiff presented insufficient evidence that defendant impliedly contracted to implement its progressive disciplinary measures with the plaintiff in every situation where the plaintiff allegedly performed his job inadequately, trial court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CHERYL SCHULT
v.
JEFFREY SCOT SCHULT
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 9, 1996.
675 A.2d 885
Carolyn Wilkes Kaas, in support of the petition., John J. Bennett and Colette S. Griffin, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 40 Conn. App. 675 (AC 13482), is denied.