McCarthy v. McCarthy, 696 A.2d 986 (Conn. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
McCarthy v. McCarthy, 696 A.2d 986 (Conn. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
53 citation events (39 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Cornfield Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Cummings (connappct, 2014-02-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Cornfield Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Cummings
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sicaras v. Hartford, 44 Conn. App. 771, 789 , 692 A.2d 1290 (plaintiff not under duress where no evidence that other party induced assent), cert. denied, 241 Conn. 916 , 696 A.2d 340 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" 98 Lords Highway, LLC v. One Hundred Lords Highway, LLC
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See CFM of Connecticut, Inc. v. Chowdhury, 239 Conn. 375, 391 , 685 A.2d 1108 (1996).” Sicaras v. Hartford, 44 Conn. App. 771, 779 , 692 A.2d 1290 , cert. denied, 241 Conn. 916 , 696 A.2d 340 (1997); see also Lusas v. St.
examined Cited "see" Waterbury Twin, LLC v. Renal Treatment Centers-Northeast, Inc. (4×)
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sicaras v. Hartford, 44 Conn.App. 771, 775 , 692 A.2d 1290 ("[w]ithdrawals are analogous to final judgments"), cert. denied, 241 Conn. 916 , 696 A.2d 340 (1997); see also Lusas v. St.
cited Cited "see" Davis v. Hebert
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sicaras v. Hartford, 44 Conn. App. 771, 775-79 , 692 A.2d 1290 , cert. denied, 241 Conn. 916 , 696 A.2d 340 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" Moore v. State, No. Cv 95-0553888s (Aug. 29, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sicaras v. Hartford , 44 Conn. App. 771 , 784 , 692 A.2d 1290 , cert. denied, 241 Conn. 916 , 696 A.2d 340 (1997). "`Meeting of the minds' is defined as "mutual agreement and assent of two parties to contract to substance and terms.
cited Cited "see" McCarthy v. McCarthy
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCarthy v. McCarthy, 44 Conn. App. 930 , 692 A.2d 869 , cert. denied, 241 Conn. 916 , 696 A.2d 986 (1997).
cited Cited "see" Smith v. Reynolds
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sicaras v. Hartford, 44 Conn. App. 771, 776 , 692 A.2d 1290 , cert. denied, 241 Conn. 916 , 696 A.2d 340 (1997).
cited Cited "see" Emerick v. Kuhn
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sicaras v. Hartford, 44 Conn. App. 771, 784 , 692 A.2d 1290 , cert. denied, 241 Conn. 916 , 696 A.2d 340 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" Connecticut Post Ltd. Parts. v. Allen, No. Cvnh 9610-7875 (Jan. 12, 1998)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
"A condition precedent is a fact or event which the parties intend must exist or take place before there is a right to performance." Lach v. Cahill, 138 Conn. 418 , 421 , 85 A.2d 481 (1951); see Sicaras v. City of Hartford, 44 Conn. App. 771 , 780 , 692 A.2d 1290 , cert. denied, 241 Conn. 916 , 696 A.2d 340 (1997).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Simmons v. Simmons
Conn. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Sicaras v. Hartford, 44 Conn. App. 771, 783-84 , 692 A.2d 1290 , cert. denied, 241 Conn. 916 , 696 A.2d 340 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DONNA M. MCCARTHY
v.
VINCENT P. MCCARTHY
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 5, 1997.
696 A.2d 986
William F. Gallagher, in support of the petition., Christine A. Janis, in opposition.
Berdon.
Published

Lead Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 930 (AC 15209), is denied.

Dissent

BERDON, J.,

dissenting. I would grant certification to appeal on the following important issue in this case in which the Appellate Court summarily affirmed the judgment of the trial court: “Whether the trial court correctly held that as a matter of law it was restricted[*917] to granting sole custody because the parties did not agree on joint custody and because one party sought joint custody (husband) and the other party sought sole custody (wife) and there was no motion for conciliation?”

William F. Gallagher, in support of the petition. Christine A. Janis, in opposition. Decided June 5, 1997