green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Armadore
(2×)
See State v. Shinn, 47 Conn. App. 401 , 408–409, 704 A.2d 816 (1997) (although defendant asserted that unpreserved claim, which was based on new rule announced while case was pending, was reviewable under both Golding and Evans standards, court reviewed claim under Golding without addressing Evans), cert. denied, 244 Conn. 913 , 713 A.2d 832 (1998), and cert. denied, 244 Conn. 914 , 713 A.2d 833 (1998); id., 419 (Foti, J., dissenting) (stating that defendant argued that his claim satisfied first exceptional circumstance in Evans); see also State v. Correa, 185 Conn. App. 308 , 322 and 322–…
cited
Cited "see"
Holmes v. Commissioner of Correction
See Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction, 47 Conn. App. 568, 584-85 , 706 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 913 , 713 A.2d 830 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lind-Larsen v. Fleet National Bank
See Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction, 47 Conn. App. 568, 586 , 706 A.2d 989 (“[a]nalysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly”), cert. denied, 244 Conn. 913 , 713 A.2d 830 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Fisher
(2×)
See State v. Shinn, 47 Conn. App. 401, 408-409 , 704 A.2d 816 (1997), cert. denied, 244 Conn. 913 , 914, 713 A.2d 832 , 833 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Henton
See Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction, 47 Conn. App. 568, 584-85 , 706 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 913 , 713 A.2d 830 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Town of Groton v. Lewis
Such a litigant is bound by the same rules of evidence and procedure as those qualified to practice law.” (Citation omitted.) Cersosimo v. Cersosimo, 188 Conn. 385, 394 , 449 A.2d 1026 (1982); see also Maloney v. Maloney, 17 Conn. App. 829, 830 , 553 A.2d 1169 (1989) (per curiam). “ ‘Although we allow pro se litigants some latitude, the right of self-representation provides no attendant license not to comply with relevant rules of procedural and substantive law.’ Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction, 47 Conn. App. 568, 586 , 706 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 913 , 713 A.2d 830 (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pollansky v. Coventry Pl. Zoning Comm., No. Cv 98 0066583s (Aug. 2, 1999)
Analysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Cummings v. Twin Tool Manufacturing Co., 40 Conn. App. 36 , 45 , 668 A.2d 1346 (1996); see also Rodriouez v. Mallory Battery Co., 188 Conn. 145 , 149 , 448 A.2d 829 (1982) ("[a]ssignments of error which are merely mentioned but not briefed beyond a statement of the claim will be deemed abandoned and will not be reviewed by [the] court") Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction, 47 Conn. App. 568 , 585-86 , …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ALEX MALAVE
v.
ALEX MALAVE
SC 15898.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 25, 1998.
Brien P. Horan and Lisa Gizzi, in support of the petition.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 597 (AC 15615), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“As a matter of policy, should the adverse witness rule of Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co., 147 Conn. 672 (1960), be abandoned?”