Bittle v. Comm'r of Soc. Servs., 717 A.2d 237 (Conn. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Bittle v. Comm'r of Soc. Servs., 717 A.2d 237 (Conn. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Harris v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2012-03-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Harris v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
The relevant facts and procedural history related to the underlying conviction were set forth by this court in a decision affirming the petitioner’s conviction; see State v. Harris, 48 Conn. App. 717 , 711 A.2d 769 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 922 , 717 A.2d 238 (1998); and in the habeas court’s memorandum of decision.
cited Cited "see" State v. Daniels
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Harris, 48 Conn. App. 717, 720 , 711 A.2d 769 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 922 , 717 A.2d 238 (1998).
cited Cited "see" Grosso v. Grosso
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rolla v. Rolla, 48 Conn. App. 732 , 735 n.1, 712 A.2d 440 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 921 , 717 A.2d 237 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Hayward v. Hayward (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 48 Conn. App. 711, 714 , 711 A.2d 1198 , cert. granted on other grounds, 245 Conn. 922 , 717 A.2d 237 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Radcliffe v. Radcliffe
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
O’Neill v. O’Neill, 13 Conn. App. 300, 307 , 536 A.2d 978 , cert. denied, 207 Conn. 806 , 540 A.2d 374 (1988); see also Rolla v. Rolla, 48 Conn. App. 732, 738 , 712 A.2d 440 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 921 , 717 A.2d 237 (1998). 6 In O’Neill , we observed that “an equitable distribution of property should take into consideration the plaintiffs contributions to the marriage, including homemaking activities and primary care taking responsibilities”; O’Neill v. O’Neill, supra, 13 Conn. App. 311 ; and that “a determination of each spouses’ contribution within the meaning of General…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Lewis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
Prior consistent statements of a witness are generally regarded as hearsay and are not admissible at trial, either for their truth or for the purpose of rehabilitating a witness’ damaged credibility.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Hines, 243 Conn. 796, 803 , 709 A.2d 522 (1998); see also State v. Harris, 48 Conn. App. 717, 730 , 711 A.2d 769 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 922 , 717 A.2d 238 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AKILAH BITTLE
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES
SC 15973.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 8, 1998.
717 A.2d 237
Robert A. Solomon and Kathleen A. Sullivan, in support of the petition., Karen Haabestad Fritzingex, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 711 (AC 17071), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that service of process pursuant to General Statutes § 4-183 (c) is not perfected upon depositing in the mail, certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy of the appeal papers, addressed to the proper agency or the attorney general within forty-five days of the agency decision?”