green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chioffi v. Martin
See Mankert v. Elmatco Products, Inc. , 84 Conn. App. 456 , 460, 854 A.2d 766 ("[a]n accounting is not available in an action where the amount due is readily ascertainable" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 925 , 859 A.2d 580 (2004).
MARY L. ALBAHARY
v.
CITY OF BRISTOL
v.
CITY OF BRISTOL
SC 17265.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 22, 2004.
Michael A. Zizka, in support of the petition., Ben M. Krowicki and Susan Kim, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 84 Conn. App. 329 (AC 24345), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the doctrine of collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, precluded the plaintiffs from obtaining compensation from the defendant for damages arising out of the defendant’s pretaking contamination of the plaintiffs’ groundwater?”