green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
14.3 score
“a cutpa violation may not arise out of conduct that is merely incidental to the performance of one's trade or commerce”
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sovereign Bank v. Licata
a cutpa violation may not arise out of conduct that is merely incidental to the performance of one's trade or commerce
discussed
Cited "see"
Kelsey v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Kelsey, 93 Conn. App. 408 , 889 A.2d 855 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 928 , 895 A.2d 800 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kelsey v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Kelsey, 93 Conn. App. 408 , 889 A.2d 855 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 928 , 895 A.2d 800 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kelsey v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Kelsey, 93 Conn. App. 408 , 410 n.1, 889 A.2d 855 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 928 , 895 A.2d 800 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Meadowbrook Center, Inc. v. Buchman
(2×)
Although this court has intimated that causation is an additional element thereof; see McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc., 93 Conn. App. 486, 503-604 , 890 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 928 , 895 A.2d 798 (2006); proof of causation more properly is classified as part and parcel of a party’s claim for breach of contract damages.
discussed
Cited "see"
Biro v. Matz
See McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc., 93 Conn. App. 486, 514-15 , 890 A.2d 140 (buyers’ claimed reliance on sellers’ misrepresentation not reasonably justifiable when buyers contractually agreed to rely on their own investigation and examination of premises and not on any representations made by sellers), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 928 , 895 A.2d 798 (2006); Visconti v. Pepper Partners Ltd.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Carter
Such challenges do not fall within the scope of the trial court’s jurisdiction for a motion to correct a sentence imposed in an illegal manner; see State v. Henderson, 93 Conn. App. 61, 74-75 , 888 A.2d 123 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 927 , 895 A.2d 800 (2006); even with due consideration given to the expansion contemplated by the Supreme Court in State v. Parker, supra, 295 Conn. 839 -40.
cited
Cited "see"
Warning Lights & Scaffold Service, Inc. v. O & G Industries, Inc.
See McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc., 93 Conn. App. 486, 503-504 , 890 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 928 , 895 A.2d 798 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pinette v. McLaughlin
See McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc., 93 Conn. App. 486, 490, 520 , 890 A.2d 140 (“ [i]t is fundamental in our law that the right of a plaintiff to recover is limited to the allegations of his complaint” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 928 , 895 A.2d 798 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gray
(2×)
See id., 36 (‘‘any potential prejudice from the loss of [evidence] was ameliorated by the court’s allowing the defendant unfet- tered cross-examination [and] . . . allowing the defen- dant to use, during closing argument, the fact that the [evidence was] missing in an attempt to raise reasonable doubt in the mind of the jury’’); see also State v. Kelsey, 93 Conn. App. 408, 422 , 889 A.2d 855 (‘‘the court amelio- rated any potential prejudice to the defendant by allowing unfettered cross-examination of the state’s witnesses regarding the loss of the evidence and in allowing his …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lynn v. Bosco
(2×)
Any relief can be granted under the general prayer which is consistent with the case stated in the complaint and is supported by the proof provided the defendant will not be surprised or prejudiced thereby." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Pamela B. v. Ment , 244 Conn. 296 , 308-309, 709 A.2d 1089 (1998) ; see also Total Aircraft, LLC v. Nascimento , 93 Conn. App. 576 , 580-81, 889 A.2d 950 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 928 , 895 A.2d 800 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Connelly
As this court has long recognized, “[sentences imposed in an illegal manner have been defined as being within the relevant statutory limits but . . . imposed in a way which violates [a] defendant’s right ... to be addressed personally at sentencing and to speak in mitigation of punishment ... or his right to be sentenced by a judge relying on accurate information or considerations solely in the record, or his right that the government keep its plea agreement promises . . . .” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. McNellis, supra, 15 Conn. App. 444 ; see State v. Parker, 295 Conn. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scrivani v. Vallombroso
The language ‘as a result of requires a showing that the prohibited act was the proximate cause of a harm to the plaintiff.” (Emphasis in original.) Abrahams v. Young & Rubicam, Inc., 240 Conn. 300, 306 , 692 A.2d 709 (1997); see also McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc., 93 Conn. App. 486, 520 , 890 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 928 , 895 A.2d 798 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tabone
See, e.g., State v. Henderson, 93 Conn. App. 61, 66 , 888 A.2d 132 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 927 , 895 A.2d 800 (2006); State v. Pagan, 75 Conn. App. 423, 429 , 816 A.2d 635 , cert. denied, 265 Conn. 901 , 829 A.2d 420 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Eric Kelsey
v.
Eric Kelsey
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 23, 2006.
Avery S. Chapman, special public defender, in support of the petition., James M. Ralls, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Vertefeuille.
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (1)
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 408 (AC 26346), is denied.
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.