green
Positive treatment
9.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dawson
See State v. Gordon , 104 Conn. App. 69 , 83-84, 931 A.2d 939 (court reminded jury prior to trial and following final argument that court, not counsel, was sole source of applicable law), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
Although we are not bound to consider an issue unless it appears on the record that the question was distinctly raised at trial and was ruled upon and decided by the court adversely to the appellant’s claim; see Brown v. Commissioner of Correction, 104 Conn. App. 144, 149 , 931 A.2d 963 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 693 (2007); contrary to the respondent’s argument, we may not decline to review a claim solely on the basis that the petitioner failed to seek an articulation.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bree
See State v. Santiago, 103 Conn. App. 406, 412 , 931 A.2d 298 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Albino
See State v. Gordon, 104 Conn. App. 69, 85 , 931 A.2d 939 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. NASHEED
We are aware of case law that holds that “the prosecutor must confine the arguments to the evidence in the record.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Whipper, 258 Conn. 229, 263 , 780 A.2d 53 (2001), overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Cruz, 269 Conn. 97, 106 , 848 A.2d 445 (2004); see State v. Santiago, 103 Conn. App. 406, 424 , 931 A.2d 298 (prosecutor may not comment unfairly on evidence in record), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
Griffin v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See Brown v. Commissioner of Correction, 104 Conn. App. 144, 149 , 931 A.2d 963 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 693 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gould
See State v. Gordon, 104 Conn. App. 69, 75 , 931 A.2d 939 (“only the court has the authority to instruct the jury on the law”), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
Newsome v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See Brown v. Commissioner of Correction, 104 Conn. App. 144, 149 , 931 A.2d 963 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 693 (2007). 5 In addition to his argument that relied on the footnote in Green , the petitioner made other arguments in his memorandum of law in support of his motion for summary judgment before the habeas court and in his appeal before this court.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. McCarthy
See State v. Santiago, 103 Conn. App. 406 , 409 n.2, 931 A.2d 298 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007). 2 For example, Ware testified that when he heard gunshots, he ran out of Melissa’s Market and that the victim still was on his feet, coming toward him, and that the victim then fell down.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Vasquez
Compare State v. Santiago, 103 Conn. App. 406, 417 , 931 A.2d 298 (trial court’s failure to give accomplice instruction harmless under plain error analysis), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert M. BROWN
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 15, 2007.
Published
Mary H. Trainer, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The petitioner Robert M. Brown's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 104 Conn.App. 144, 931 A.2d 963 (2007), is denied.