discussed Cited "see" State v. Wright See State v. Ross V., 110 Conn. App. 1, 9 , 953 A.2d 945 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 939 , 958 A.2d 1247 (2008); see also, e.g., State v. Gonzalez, 205 Conn. 673 , 683–84, 535 A.2d 345 (1987) (‘‘The defendant argues that his counsel’s alleged failure to represent the defendant zeal- ously required the trial court to allow him to discharge his attorney. . . .

discussed Cited "see" State v. Lanier See State v. Sulser, 109 Conn. App. 852, 874 , 953 A.2d 919 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 939 , 959 A.2d 1006 (2008); see also State v. Davis, 298 Conn. 1 , 23–24, 1 A.3d 76 (2010) (trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence when defendant’s foundation for proffered evidence was ‘‘wholly specula- tive’’).

discussed Cited "see" Heyse v. Case See State v. Ross V., 110 Conn. App. 1, 7 , 953 A.2d 945 (court’s discretion whether to grant continuance will not be disturbed on appeal absent abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 289 Conn. 939 , 958 A.2d 1247 (2008).