Caban v. Comm'r of Corr., 971 A.2d 40 (Conn. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Caban v. Comm'r of Corr., 971 A.2d 40 (Conn. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Lyons (connappct, 2021-03-30)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Lyons
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jones, 113 Conn. App. 250 , 255–56, 966 A.2d 277 , cert. denied, 292 Conn. 901 , 971 A.2d 40 (2009). ‘‘When reviewing a trial court’s [ruling on] a motion to suppress, [a] finding of fact will not be disturbed unless it is clearly erroneous in view of the evidence and pleadings in the whole record . . . . [W]hen a question of fact is essential to the outcome of a particular legal determination that implicates a defendant’s constitutional rights, [how- ever] and the credibility of witnesses is not the primary issue, our customary deference to the trial court’s fac- tual…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Willoughby
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jones, 113 Conn. App. 250, 262 , 966 A.2d 277 (‘‘[a] police officer has the right to stop a motor vehicle operating on a Connecticut highway even if the reason for the stop is only an infraction under our traffic laws’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 901 , 971 A.2d 40 (2009).
cited Cited "see" Holliday v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Caban v. Commissioner of Correction, 113 Conn. App. 165, 170 , 965 A.2d 601 (record devoid of evidence that could have changed outcome of trial), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 901 , 971 A.2d 40 (2009).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ruiz
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Auerbach v. Auerbach, 113 Conn. App. 318, 327 , 966 A.2d 292 (“[a] factual finding is clearly erroneous when it is not supported by any evidence in the record or when there is evidence to support it, but the reviewing court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 901 , 971 A.2d 40 (2009). 6 The defendant maintains that our standard of review is whether the court abused its discretion because “an evidentiary ruling is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.” The videotaped testim…
discussed Cited "see" O'Connell, Flaherty & Attmore, LLC v. Doody
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Auerbach v. Auerbach, 113 Conn. App. 318, 325 , 966 A.2d 292 , cert. denied, 292 Conn. 901 , 971 A.2d 40 (2009). 10 It is not certain whether the defendant is complaining of the facts found by the fact finder or of the court’s judgment rendered pursuant to the fact finder’s findings.
discussed Cited "see" DiRienzo Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Salce Contracting Associates, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jones, 113 Conn. App. 250 , 261 n.6, 966 A.2d 277 (“[T]he determination of a witness’ credibility is the special function of the trial court. [A reviewing] court cannot sift and weigh evidence.” [Internal quotation marks omitted.]), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 901 , 971 A.2d 40 (2009).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Bruno
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
Indeed, the Appellate Court previously has used the phrase “persistent drug offender” to describe a defendant who has been convicted of committing subsequent offenses under § 21a-278 (b) and General Statutes § 21a-277 (b); see State v. Jones, 113 Conn. App. 250 , 252 n.1, 966 A.2d 277 , cert. denied, 292 Conn. 901 , 971 A.2d 40 (2009); Knight v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 617, 618 , 793 A.2d 1092 (2002); State v. Knight, 50 Conn. App. 109, 110 , 717 A.2d 274 (1998); a fact that strongly supports our conclusion that it was not inherently misleading or otherwise unreasonable…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fitzsimons v. Fitzsimons
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Auerbach v. Auerbach, 113 Conn. App. 318, 337 , 966 A.2d 292 , cert. denied, 292 Conn. 901 , 971 A.2d 40 (2009); Gentile v. Carneiro, 107 Conn. App. 630, 654 , 946 A.2d 871 (2008); Bee v. Bee, 79 Conn. App. 783, 786-87 , 831 A.2d 833 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 932 , 837 A.2d 805 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joel CABAN
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 13, 2009.
971 A.2d 40
Published

Deborah G. Stevenson, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Melissa L. Streeto, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Joel Caban's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 113 Conn.App. 165, 965 A.2d 601 (2009), is denied.