Baltimore & Ohio R.R. v. United States, 58 Ct. Cl. 709 (1923). · Go Syfert
Search
Baltimore & Ohio R.R. v. United States, 58 Ct. Cl. 709 (1923). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“in california, a 'clear agreement' to arbitrate may be either express or implied in fact.”
84 citation events (71 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bashiti v. Tutu Park, Ltd. (virginislands, 2017-05-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Bashiti v. Tutu Park, Ltd.
virginislands · 2017 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
in california, a 'clear agreement' to arbitrate may be either express or implied in fact.
cited Cited "see" Home Federal Bank of Tennessee, F.S.B. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Balt. & Ohio R.R. v. United States, 261 U.S. 592, 597 , 58 Ct.Cl. 709 , 43 S.Ct. 425 , 67 L.Ed. 816 (1923).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hamilton Securities Advisory Services, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Gov’t App. at 85, 128; see also Baltimore & O.R.R. v. United States, 261 U.S. 592, 596-97 , 58 Ct.Cl. 709 , 43 S.Ct. 425 , 67 L.Ed. 816 (1923) (a government official cannot commit to an implied-in-fact contract, which ipso facto is beyond the scope of his authority).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY
v.
United States
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 9, 1923.
58 Ct. Cl. 709
Sanford.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of The Virgin Is… (1)
Mr. Justice Sanford

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court April 9, 1923.