Gale E. Wagner v. William E. Simon, Sec'y, Treasury of the United States, 534 F.2d 833 (8th Cir. 1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Gale E. Wagner v. William E. Simon, Sec'y, Treasury of the United States, 534 F.2d 833 (8th Cir. 1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Boggs v. Bowron (dcd, 1993-12-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Boggs v. Bowron (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
D.D.C. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wagner v. *561 Simon, 412 F.Supp. 426, 430 (W.D.Mo.1974), aff'd 534 F.2d 833 (8th Cir.1976) (citing Koran v. United States, 408 F.2d 1321 , 1325 n. 12 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied 402 U.S. 948 , 91 S.Ct. 1603 , 29 L.Ed.2d 118 (1971)) (noting differences in the “in the likeness” and “after the similitude” test).
discussed Cited "see" Regan v. Time, Inc.
SCOTUS · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wagner v. Simon, 412 F. Supp. 426 (WD Mo.), aff’d, 534 F. 2d 833 (CA8 1976) (upholding confiscation by Secret Service agents of 3-foot long political protest poster depicting bill made to appear as a “$30 Inflationary Note” with picture of President Nixon at center); Washington Post, Nov. 17, 1983, p.
cited Cited "see" Time, Inc. v. Regan
S.D.N.Y. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wagner v. Simon, 412 F.Supp. 426 (W.D.Mo.1974), affirmed, 534 F.2d 833 (8th Cir. 1976). 9 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.
W.D. Mo. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Wagner v. Simon, 412 F.Supp. 426 (W.D.Mo.1974) aff’d 534 F.2d 833 (8th Cir.1976) (purpose of Declaratory Judgment Act is to afford remedy to one who is uncertain of his rights and desire adjudication without having to wait until his adversary decides to bring suit); New York Life Ins.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gale E. WAGNER, Appellant,
v.
William E. SIMON, Secretary, Treasury of the United States, Et Al., Appellees
75-1693.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Apr 29, 1976.
534 F.2d 833
Arthur Á. Benson, II, Kansas City, Mo., for appellant., Mark N. Mutterperl, Appellate Section, Civ. Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee; Rex E. Lee, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., and Bert C. Hurn, U. S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., on the briefs.
Vogel, Van Ooster-Hout Bright.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
VOGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Appellant appeals from an adverse decision in a declaratory judgment action brought in the District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Judge Collinson presiding. Appellant had sought a determination of whether his photographic reproduction of a Federal Reserve Note for artistic purposes falls within the prohibitive scope of 18 U.S.C. § 474 (1970) of the Counterfeiting and Forgery Statute, and whether, if so, the statute infringes upon his First Amendment right to free expression.

We have carefully reviewed the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and we affirm the judgment of the District Court on the basis of its comprehensive opinion as published in 412 F.Supp. 426. Wagner v. Simon et al. (W.D.Mo.1974).

Affirmed.