neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AMERICAN MARINE CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
the TOWBOAT Z-FOURTEEN, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., Appellee
v.
the TOWBOAT Z-FOURTEEN, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., Appellee
19752_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 29, 1963.
Charles W. Howard, Jr., Charles D. Marshall, New Orleans, La., Edgar F. Barnett, Lake Charles, La., Neal D. Hobson, New Orleans, La. (Milling, Saal, Saunders, Benson & Woodward, New Orleans, La., Hall, Raggio & Farrar, Lake Charles, La., of counsel), for appellant., Walter C. Peters, Jennings, La., George B. Matthews, Thomas W. Thorne, Jr., New Orleans, La., Lemle & Kelleher, New Orleans, La., Adams & Peters, Jennings, La., for appellee.
Cameron, Wisdom.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
The questions raised in this in rem proceeding involving an alleged lien on a vessel are well delineated in the published findings of facts and conclusions of law of the court below. [1] We find them to be accurate and to deal fully with the issues of law and fact involved. We agree with the conclusions reached and the reasons given by the court below; and, based upon them, the judgment is
Affirmed.
1
. American Marine Corporation v. The Towboat Z-Fourteen, etc., 1962, W.D. La., 214 F.Supp. 849.