William S. & Mary P. Serri v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 354 F.2d 1002 (3rd Cir. 1966). · Go Syfert
William S. & Mary P. Serri v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 354 F.2d 1002 (3rd Cir. 1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Federal Trade Commission (nysd, 1966-06-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
S.D.N.Y. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See United Gas Corp. v. Pennzoil Co., 248 F.Supp. 449 (S.D.N.Y. 1965), aff’d per curiam, 354 F.2d 1002 (2 Cir. 1965). 4.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William S. And Mary P. Serri
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
15321.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Feb 18, 1966.
354 F.2d 1002
Published

354 F.2d 1002

William S. and Mary P. SERRI, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 15321.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued November 18, 1965.

Decided December 2, 1965.

Rehearing Denied February 18, 1966.

On Petition for Review of the Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

David Berger, Philadelphia, Pa., (Frank S. Deming, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioners.

Burton Berkley, Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D. C. (John B. Jones, Jr., Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, John M. Brant, Jeanine Jacobs, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before KALODNER, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

On review of the record we find no error. The Decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated in Judge Hoyt's Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion (T. C. Memo 1964-219).