Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. John T. Connor, Sec'y of the Dep't of Com. of the United States of Am., 366 F.2d 778 (1st Cir. 1966). · Go Syfert
Search
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. John T. Connor, Sec'y of the Dep't of Com. of the United States of Am., 366 F.2d 778 (1st Cir. 1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“since the amount in controversy exceeds 10,000 the action may be brought only in court of claims”
34 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Bank of Fairhaven v. United States (mad, 1987-03-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) National Bank of Fairhaven v. United States
D. Mass. · 1987 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
since the amount in controversy exceeds 10,000 the action may be brought only in court of claims
cited Cited "see" American Science and Engineering, Inc. v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
1st Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Connor, 248 F.Supp. 656 (D.Mass.), aff’d, 366 F.2d 778 (1st Cir. 1966).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Carey v. Local Board No. 2, Hartford, Connecticut
D. Conn. · 1969 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Massachusetts v. Connor, 248 F.Supp. 656 (D.Mass.1966), aff’d, 366 F.2d 778 (1st Cir. 1967), with C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
v.
John T. Connor, Secretary of the Department of Commerce of the United States of America
6722_1.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Oct 7, 1966.
366 F.2d 778
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 85%
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (1)

366 F.2d 778

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
John T. CONNOR, Secretary of the Department of Commerce of the United States of America et al., Defendants, Appellees.

No. 6722.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

Heard October 4, 1966.

Decided October 7, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts; Francis J. W. Ford, Judge.

Frederic E. Greenman, Asst. Atty. Gen., with whom Edward W. Brooke, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Seegel, Asst. Atty. Gen., were on brief, for appellant.

Morton Hollander, Attorney, Department of Justice, with whom John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Paul F. Markham, U. S. Atty., and Richard Salzman, Attorney, Department of Justice, were on brief, for appellees.

Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, WOODBURY[*], Senior Judge, and McENTEE, Circuit Judge.

OPINION OF THE COURT.

PER CURIAM.

1

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the District Court, D.Mass., 1966, 248 F.Supp. 656.

Notes:

*

Sitting by designation