Layton Griffin, Jr., Fletcher Anderson & Bruce Baines v. State of Louisiana, 395 F.2d 991 (5th Cir. 1968). · Go Syfert
Layton Griffin, Jr., Fletcher Anderson & Bruce Baines v. State of Louisiana, 395 F.2d 991 (5th Cir. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Houston Chronicle Publishing Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-Cross (ca5, 1973-07-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Houston Chronicle Publishing Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-Cross
5th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See 395 F.2d at 991 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Reverend John M. Perkins v. State of Mississippi
5th Cir. · 1972 · signal: see also · confidence low
In none of these instances did the petitioners allege or prove that the conduct triggering their arrests and prosecutions was protected by a law providing for equal rights in terms of race, or that the prosecutions were initiated exclusively for the purpose of punishing, harassing, intimidating or interfering with the exercise of such rights 28 But see Achtenberg v. Mississippi, infra; see also Griffin v. Louisiana, E.D.La., 1967, 269 F.Supp. 32 , vacated and remanded, 5 Cir., 1968, 395 F.2d 991 ; Heymann v. Louisiana, E.D.La., 1967, 269 F.Supp. 36 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Layton GRIFFIN, Jr., Fletcher Anderson and Bruce Baines, Appellants,
v.
STATE OF LOUISIANA, Appellee
25087.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
May 13, 1968.
395 F.2d 991
Alvin J. Bronstein, Jackson, Miss., Richard B. Sobol, New Orleans, La., Collins, Douglas & Elie, New Orleans, La., for appellants., Jack P. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., William P. Schuler, Second Asst. Dist. Atty., Baton Rouge, La., Woodrow W. Erwin, Dist. Atty., Franklinton, La., for appellee.
Brown, Dyer, Garza, Per Curiam.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

Appellants were indicted for murder in the Louisiana state court and they thereafter removed the cases to the District Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1443 (1), relying upon State of Georgia v. Rachel, 1966, 384 U.S. 780, 790, 86 S.Ct. 1783, 16 L.Ed.2d 925. The court below remanded to the state court, holding that Rachel authorized removals only when the state court prosecution, as shown by the indictment, was expressly against conduct authorized by Title II of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000a. D.C., 269 F.Supp. 32.

During the pendency of this appeal we decided Wyche v. State of Louisiana, 5 Cir., 394 F.2d 927 (October 26, 1967) and Achtenberg v. Mississippi, 5 Cir., 393 F.2d 468 (February 5, 1968), both Title II cases. The appellant has moved to remand, so that the District Court may, as it desires to do, reconsider its decision in this matter- in the light of our decisions in Wyche and Achtenberg, supra. We think this is proper.

The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded.