Fed.-Mogul Corp. v. Cox Automation, Inc, 541 F.2d 284 (7th Cir. 1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Fed.-Mogul Corp. v. Cox Automation, Inc, 541 F.2d 284 (7th Cir. 1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dickey-John Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. International Tapetronics Corporation and Field Electronics, Inc., Cross-Appellees (ca7, 1983-06-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Dickey-John Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. International Tapetronics Corporation and Field Electronics, Inc., Cross-Appellees (2×)
7th Cir. · 1983 · confidence medium
We have long recognized that the "prior art that is relevant in evaluating a claim of obviousness is defined by the nature of the problem confronting the would-be inventor." Louis A. Grant, Inc. v. Keibler Industries, Inc., 541 F.2d 284, 291 (7th Cir.1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sims v. MacK Trucks, Inc.
E.D. Pa. · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Louis A. Grant, Inc. v. Keibler Indus., Inc., 377 F.Supp. 1069, 1083 (N.D.Ind.1973), appeal dismissed, 541 F.2d 284 (7th Cir. 1976), in which the court limited the rule to situations in which the reversal produces no new results. 7 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Federal-Mogul Corp.
v.
Cox Automation, Inc
75-1457.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Sep 16, 1976.
541 F.2d 284
Published

541 F.2d 284

Federal-Mogul Corp.
v.
Cox Automation, Inc.

No. 74-1547, 75-1457

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

9/16/76

1

N.D.Ill.

AFFIRMED