green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
18.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1983 ·
…as evidence becomes available that the next 20 or 30 years will not be like the past 20 or 30 years, then the feldman approach is less helpful.
at p. 302
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Ruiz Rondon v. Carnival Corporation
in those instances where the substantive law permits a court to award pre-judgment interest, the court must discount the damage figure back to the date of the event, i.e. injury or death, and may award pre-judgment interest for the period between the event and judgment.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Culver v. Slater Boat Co.
(5×)
also: Cited as authority (rule), Cited "see"
penalizes defendants because . .. interest rates on relatively safe investments will typically ride several percentage points above the rate of inflation
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Ruth Culver, Cross-Appellees v. Slater Boat Co., Cross-Appellants, Europirates International, Inc., and Cross-Appellees-Appellants v. Odeco Drilling, Cross-Appellants. Willie Mae Byrd, as Administratrix of the Estate of Lawrence Byrd, Deceased, Cross-Appellee v. Heinrich Schmidt Reederei, Cross-Appellant
(4×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
penalizes defendants because ... interest rates on relatively safe investments will typically ride several percentage points above the rate of inflation
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Labat v. Mallard Bay Drilling Co.
In Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280, 301 (5th Cir.1982) the court made it clear that likely promotions and other issues pertaining to increased productivity should be calculated into projections on future income loss.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Emerson G.M. Diesel, Inc. v. Alaskan Enterprise, Official No. 595760, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Furniture and Equipment, in Rem Offshore Fisheries, Inc., a Washington Corporation Miller Industries, Inc., a Washington Corporation and Francis L. Miller, in Personam, Defendants/third-Party v. General Motors Corporation, Third-Party and Twin Disc, Inc., Third-Party
Twin Disc relies on a Fifth Circuit decision, Johnson v. Penrod Drilling Company, 469 F.2d 897, 903 (5th Cir.1972), reh'g granted, 478 F.2d 1208 (5th Cir.1973), reh'g, 510 F.2d 234 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 839 , 96 S.Ct. 69 , 46 L.Ed.2d 58 (1975), overruled on other grounds, Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280, 283 (5th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Emerson G.M. Diesel, Inc. v. Alaskan Enterprise
Twin Disc relies on a Fifth Circuit decision, Johnson v. Penrod Drilling Company, 469 F.2d 897, 903 (5th Cir.1972), reh’g granted, 478 F.2d 1208 (5th Cir.1973), reh’g, 510 F.2d 234 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 839 , 96 S.Ct. 69 , 46 L.Ed.2d 58 (1975), overruled on other grounds, Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280, 283 (5th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Pfeifer
Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F. 2d 280, 308-310 (1982). 27 A panel of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has taken a substantially similar position.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
David L. Robert v. Conti Carriers & Terminals, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Culver v. Slater Boat Co., supra, 688 F.2d at 305-306.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Louis Michael Ober, Cross-Appellant v. Penrod Drilling Company, Cross-Appellee
Alaska Rule,” and “the Feldman [v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc., 524 F.2d 384 ] approach ... is clearly superior, and more economically sound, than ... the Alaska Rule.” Culver , at 299, 302. 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ribitzki v. Canmar Reading & Bates, Ltd. Partnership
See Davis v. Hill Engineering, Inc., 549 F.2d 314, 329 (5th Cir.1977), overruled on other grounds in both Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280 (5th Cir.1982) and Gautreaux v. Scurlock Marine, Inc., 107 F.3d 331 (5th Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ribitzki v. Canmar Reading & Bates, Ltd. Partnership
See Davis v. Hill Engineering, Inc., 549 F.2d 314, 329 (5th Cir.1977), overruled on other grounds in both Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280 (5th Cir.1982) and Gautreaux v. Scurlock Marine, Inc., 107 F.3d 331 (5th Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tallentire v. Offshore Logistics, Inc.
See Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280, 302 (5th Cir.1982), modified in other respects Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 722 F.2d 114 (5th Cir.1983); Madore v. Ingram Tank Ships, Inc., 732 F.2d 475, 479 (5th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beth A. Tallentire v. Offshore Logistics, Inc., Air Logistics, Corine Ann Soudelier Taylor, Individually, as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael John Taylor, and as Natural Tutrix of the Minor, Leslie Ann Taylor, Cross-Appellee v. Bell Helicopter Textron, a Division of Textron, Inc., Corine Ann Soudelier Taylor, Etc., Cross-Appellee v. Air Logistics, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Halliburton Services, Intervenor-Appellee
See Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280, 302 (5th Cir.1982), modified in other respects Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 722 F.2d 114 (5th Cir.1983); Madore v. Ingram Tank Ships, Inc., 732 F.2d 475, 479 (5th Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard E. Madore v. Ingram Tank Ships, Inc. v. Samson Ocean Systems, Inc.
See 688 F.2d at 303-04 .
cited
Cited "see"
Darnell Hunter, Cross-Appellant v. Reardon Smith Lines, Ltd., a Foreign Corporation, Cross
See Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280 (5th Cir.1982) (en banc); 16 see also Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Pfeifer, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2541 , 76 L.Ed.2d 768 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Edwards v. United States
See Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280 (5th Cir.1982) (en banc). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Byrd v. Heinrich Schmidt Reederei
See Culver, supra. In short, we find that Byrd’s objection to the jury charge is properly before this Court under F.R.Civ.P. 51.
cited
Cited "see"
Byrd v. Heinrich Schmidt Reederei
See Culver, supra. In short, we find that Byrd's objection to the jury charge is properly before this Court under F.R.Civ.P. 51. 12 REVERSED AND REMANDED.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Siragusa v. Standard Steamship Owners Protection
See, e.g., Johnson v. Penrod Drilling Co., 469 F.2d 897 (5th Cir.1972), on reh’g., 510 F.2d 234 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 839 , 96 S.Ct. 68 , 46 L.Ed.2d 58 (1975), overruled on other grounds, Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280 (5th Cir.1982) (en banc); Banks v. Hanover Steamship Corporation, 43 F.R.D. 374 (D.Md.1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Armatur, Sa
See, e.g., Johnson v. Penrod Drilling Co., 469 F.2d 897 (5th Cir.1972), on reh'g., 510 F.2d 234 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 839 , 96 S.Ct. 68 , 46 L.Ed.2d 58 (1975), overruled on other grounds, Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280 (5th Cir.1982) (en banc); Banks v. Hanover Steamship Corporation, 43 F.R.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Joan Smith v. Industrial Constructors, Inc.
See also Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280, 289-90 (5th Cir.1982), en banc, relevant part reaff'd, 722 F.2d 114 , 123 (5th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Industrial Constructors, Inc.
See also Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280, 289-90 (5th Cir.1982), en banc, relevant part reaff’d, 722 F.2d 114, 123 (5th Cir.1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
THOMASVILLE BRANCH OF the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR the ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
THOMAS COUNTY, GEORGIA, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
v.
THOMAS COUNTY, GEORGIA, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
80-7412.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Sep 20, 1982.
Herbert Phipps, Albany, Ga., David F. Walbert, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants., Whitehurst, Cohen & Blackburn, A. J. Whitehurst, Thomasville, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
Jones, Fay, Henderson.
Published
PER CURIAM:
All pending motions for rehearing and requests for injunctive relief are denied. The matter is remanded to the trial court in accordance with our opinion rendered on March 20, 1981, reported at 639 F.2d 1384, and supplemented by the holding of the Supreme Court of the United States in Rogers v. Lodge,-U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 3272, 73 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1982).