green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Santini v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
See Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (E.D.Pa., 1982), 536 F.Supp. 653 , aff'd (3rd Cir.1982) 696 F.2d 981 , aff'd (1983), 461 U.S. 912 , 103 S.Ct. 1888 , 77 L.Ed.2d 280 (assuming proper test for preemption of Pennsylvania statute requiring locomotives to have speed recorders and indicators was contained in Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970, 45 U.S.C. § 434 , state statute was preempted because federal regulation covered same subject matter); National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Coleman (3rd Cir.1976) 542 F.2d 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ollie M. Taft v. Alabama By-Products Corporation, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
Accord Sherry v. Tesone Coal Co., 4 BLR 1-377, aff'd without published opinion, 696 F.2d 981 and 985 (3d Cir.1982); Johnson v. Cannelton Industries, Inc., 2 BLR 1-1081 (1980); Blankenship v. Beatrice Pocahontas Co., 3 BLR 1-773 (1981); aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary Marshall, Individually and as Personal Representative v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
Accord Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utilities Comm’n, 536 F.Supp. 653 (E.D.Pa.1982), aff’d mem., 696 F.2d 981 (3d Cir.1982), aff’d sum. sub nom., Pennsylvania Public Utilities Comm’n v. Consolidated Rail Corp., — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 1888 , 77 L.Ed.2d 280 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Decrescenzo
v.
Schulman
v.
Schulman
81-2811.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Nov 1, 1982.
696 F.2d 981
Published
Decrescenzo
v.
Schulman
81-2811
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit
11/1/82
1
E.D.Pa.
AFFIRMED