Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 833 F.2d 1436 (11th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 833 F.2d 1436 (11th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases · "the introduction of nonstatutory mitigating evidence is meaningless if the jury is instructed not to consider that evidence"
5 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: DeVargas v. Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co. (ca10, 1988-04-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" DeVargas v. Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co.
10th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 808 F.2d 1435, 1440-42 (11th Cir.1987), vacated in part on other grounds, 822 F.2d 998 (11th Cir.1987), opinion vacated and rehearing granted en banc, 833 F.2d 1436 (11th Cir.1987); Watertown Equipment Co. v. Norwest Bank Watertown, N.A., 830 F.2d 1487 (8th Cir.1987); Buller v. Buechler, 706 F.2d 844 , 850-52 (8th Cir.1983) (private individual who relies upon unconstitutional state garnishment procedure may assert qualified immunity defense); Folsom Investment Co. v. Moore, 681 F.2d 1032, 1037-38 (5th Cir. Unit A 1982) (private party who relies on presumptively v…
discussed Cited "see" Alfredo Devargas v. Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc. T.R. Hook, Individually and in His Official Capacity Don Hardwick, Individually and in His Official Capacity, and John Does, Individually and in Their Official Capacities, Los Alamos National Laboratory Richard One Through Two, Individually and in Their Official Capacities University of California Robert Pogna, Employee Los Alamos National Laboratory, Alfredo Devargas v. Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc. T.R. Hook, Individually and in His Official Capacity Don Hardwick, Individually and in His Official Capacity, and the United States Department of Energy John Does, Individually and in Their Official Capacities Los Alamos National Laboratory Richard One Through Two, Individually and in Their Official Capacities Gary Granere, Acting Area Manager-Department of Energy Los Alamos Area Office University of California Donald Kerr, Director, Los Alamos National Laboratory Ed. C. Walterscheid, Employee Los Alamos National Laboratory John S. Herrington Robert Pogna, Employee Los Alamos National Laboratory
10th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 808 F.2d 1435, 1440-42 (11th Cir.1987), vacated in part on other grounds, 822 F.2d 998 (11th Cir.1987), opinion vacated and rehearing granted en banc, 833 F.2d 1436 (11th Cir.1987); Watertown Equipment Co. v. Norwest Bank Watertown, N.A., 830 F.2d 1487 (8th Cir.1987); Buller v. Buechler, 706 F.2d 844 , 850-52 (8th Cir.1983) (private individual who relies upon unconstitutional state garnishment procedure may assert qualified immunity defense); Folsom Investment Co. v. Moore, 681 F.2d 1032, 1037-38 (5th Cir. Unit A 1982) (private party who relies on presumptively v…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Samuel Jones, Jr.
v.
Preuit & Mauldin, a Partnership Composed of E.F. Mauldin, Individually, and E.F. Mauldin as or Administrator of the Estate of Leonard Preuit, Deceased E.F. Mauldin E.F. Mauldin as or Administrator of the Estate of Leonard Preuit, Deceased and Preuit Mauldin
86-7415-1.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Nov 24, 1987.
833 F.2d 1436
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 90%
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)

833 F.2d 1436

Samuel JONES, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PREUIT & MAULDIN, a partnership composed of E.F. Mauldin,
individually, and E.F. Mauldin as Executor or Administrator
of the Estate of Leonard Preuit, Deceased; E.F. Mauldin;
E.F. Mauldin as Executor or Administrator of the Estate of
Leonard Preuit, Deceased; and Preuit Mauldin, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-7415-1.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Nov. 24, 1987.

Burr & Forman, C.V. Stelzenmuller, F.A. Flowers, III, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellant.

Potts, Young, Blasingame & Putnam, Robert W. Beasley, Florence, Ala., Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., Ronald C. Forehand, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State of Ala., Montgomery, Ala., Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, David G. Hymer, Donald M. James, Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

1

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

2

(Opinion July 24, 1987, 11th Cir., 1987, 822 F.2d 998)

BY THE COURT:

3

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

4

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of February 22, 1988, on or hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.