United States v. Jesus Leyva-Villalobos, 872 F.2d 335 (9th Cir. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Jesus Leyva-Villalobos, 872 F.2d 335 (9th Cir. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Burtch v. Ganz (In Re Mushroom Transportation Co.) (paed, 2002-09-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Burtch v. Ganz (In Re Mushroom Transportation Co.)
E.D. Pa. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See 28 Am.Jur.2d, Escrow § 20 (2000); see also In re First Capital Mortgage Loan Corp., 99 B.R. 462 , 464 n. 1 (D.Utah 1987) (“At times courts also refer to escrow agents as ‘trustees,’ but in a strict sense an escrow agent is not a trustee because he does not hold legal title to the property entrusted to Mm”), rev’d, 872 F.2d 335 (10th Cir.1989), panel decision vacated, district court aff'd, 917 F.2d 424 , 428 n. 3 (10th Cir.1990) (en banc) (“Significant authority exists for the proposition that an escrow holder is an agent with neither legal nor equitable title to the funds it h…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jesus LEYVA-VILLALOBOS, Defendant-Appellant
89-50116.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Apr 24, 1989.
872 F.2d 335
Wallace, Alarcon, Norris.
Published

On January 24, 1989, the district court denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the indictment and disqualify the special Assistant United States Attorney, finding that neither Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(d) nor 6(e) had been violated. On January 24, 1989, appellant filed a timely interlocutory appeal under United States v. Benjamin, 812 F.2d 548 (9th Cir.), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied (1987).

On March 28, 1989, the Supreme Court held that an order denying a motion to dismiss an indictment for an alleged violation of Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e) is not immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1494, 103 L.Ed.2d 879. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.