Oliver M. Bond & Herta R. Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc., 926 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Oliver M. Bond & Herta R. Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc., 926 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bernard Barone v. Rich Bros. Interstate Display Fireworks Co. (ca8, 1994-07-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Bernard Barone v. Rich Bros. Interstate Display Fireworks Co.
8th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc., 745 F.Supp. 710, 714-15 (M.D.Ga.1990), aff'd, 926 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1232 , 111 S.Ct. 2855 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1023 (1991).
cited Cited "see" Barone v. Rich Bros. Interstate Display Fireworks Co.
8th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc., 745 F.Supp. 710, 714-15 (M.D.Ga.1990), aff'd, 926 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1232 , 111 S.Ct. 2855 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1023 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oliver M. Bond and Herta R. Bond
v.
Octagon Process, Inc.
90-8898.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Mar 28, 1991.
926 F.2d 1573
Published

926 F.2d 1573

Oliver M. BOND and Herta R. Bond, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
OCTAGON PROCESS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-8898.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 28, 1991.

E. Freeman Leverett, Heard, Leverett, Adams and Phelps, P.C., Elberton, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Carl R. Woodward, III, Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi & Stewart, Roseland, N.J. and Peter J. Anderson, Peterson, Dillard, Young Self & Asselin, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Duross Fitzpatrick, District Judge.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, DUBINA, Circuit Judge, and HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the district court's dispositive opinion, which is reported as Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc., 745 F.Supp. 710 (M.D.Ga.1990).

2

AFFIRMED.