Herminio B. Reutotar v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 928 F.2d 411 (Fed. Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Herminio B. Reutotar v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 928 F.2d 411 (Fed. Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Stephen B. Licata v. United States Postal Service (ca3, 1994-08-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Stephen B. Licata v. United States Postal Service
3rd Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hayes v. United States, 20 Cl.Ct. 150, 153 (1990), affd mem., 928 F.2d 411 (Fed.Cir.1991).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Carrington v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hayes v. United States, 20 Cl.Ct. 150 (1990), aff'd on other grounds, 928 F.2d 411 (Fed.Cir.1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lublin Corp. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2008 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Hayes v. U.S. Postal Serv., 859 F.2d 354, 356-57 (5th Cir.1988) (holding that the solicitation of suggestions to improve an agency’s efficiency is the procurement of a service within the meaning of the CDA) with Hayes v. United States, 20 Cl.Ct. 150, 153-54 (1990) (holding that the solicitation of suggestions was not a procurement of services), aff'd on other grounds, 928 F.2d 411 (Fed.Cir.1991). .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Miller Elevator Co. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United Food Servs., Inc. v. United States, 19 Cl.Ct. 539, 549 (1990), aff'd, 928 F.2d 411 (Fed.Cir.1991); Underground Constr.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Herminio B. Reutotar
v.
Office of Personnel Management
90-3506.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Feb 14, 1991.
928 F.2d 411
Unpublished

928 F.2d 411

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Herminio B. REUTOTAR, Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 90-3506.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 14, 1991.

On Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board, in Case No(s). SE08318910556.

45 M.S.P.R. 533.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIES, Chief Judge, MAYER and MICHEL Circuit Judges:

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

1

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.