green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mississippi Department of Human Services v. S.W.
See generally Keyes v. Huckleberry House, 936 F.2d 578 (9th Cir.1991) (finding that a private facility might be found to be state actor if child was ward of the state and the state provided care through the private agency); Hanis ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Montez Porchia v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
See Martinez v. Comm’r Internal Revenue, 936 F.2d 578 , 1991 WL 113720 (9th Cir. June 21, 1991); see also Silverton v. Valley Transit Cement Co., 237 F.2d 143, 145 (9th Cir.1956); cf. In re Piper Aircraft Distribution Sys.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1996
The Board has explicitly "disavow[ed] any construction of Advance Waste Systems as appropriately applying a 'reasonable expectation of employment' test to sick leave cases, and we continue to adhere to the Red Arrow test." Pepsi-Cola Co., 315 N.L.R.B. 1322 , 1324 (1995); accord Thorn Americas, Inc., 314 N.L.R.B. 943 (1994). 34 In the other two post-Red Arrow cases Cavert cites, Keeler Brass Automotive Group, 301 N.L.R.B. 769 (1991), and Liston Aluminum, 296 N.L.R.B. 1181 , 1203 (1989), enf'd 936 F.2d 578 (9th Cir.1991), the Board used reasonable expectation language but based its determination…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Beasley
Office of Children & Youth Servs., 418 F.Supp.2d 643, 651 (E.D.Pa.2005) (finding that foster care agencies that assist in the placement of foster children perform a function that has been traditionally the exclusive prerogative of the State regardless of whether the child is forcibly taken from his home); see also Keyes v. Huckleberry House, 936 F.2d 578 , at *1 (9th Cir.1991) (stating that “a private child care institution might be found to be a state actor if the child was in effect a ward of the state and the state was providing care through the private agency”); Barron v. Washington Cn…
Johnson (Harmon H.)
v.
Clark (D. Blair), Clark, Harrington, Reid, Christenson & Kaufman, Perry (Bruce), White, Ahrens, Peterson & Perry
v.
Clark (D. Blair), Clark, Harrington, Reid, Christenson & Kaufman, Perry (Bruce), White, Ahrens, Peterson & Perry
90-35834.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jun 11, 1991.
Published
Johnson (Harmon H.)
v.
Clark (D. Blair), Clark, Harrington, Reid, Christenson &
Kaufman, Perry (Bruce), White, Ahrens, Peterson & Perry
NO. 90-35834
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
JUN 11, 1991
Appeal From: D.Idaho
1
AFFIRMED.