Adams v. St. Lucie Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 982 F.2d 472 (11th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Adams v. St. Lucie Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 982 F.2d 472 (11th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Goodgame v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co. (ca11, 1996-02-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Goodgame v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co. (2×) also: Cited "see"
11th Cir. · 1996 · confidence medium
Before Landgraf, Rivers, and our decision in Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Service, Inc., 982 F.2d 472, 473-74 (11th Cir.1993), many trial courts reached the opposite conclusion and applied the Act to claims pending before its November 1991 effective date.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Malone v. Chambers County Board of Commissioners (2×)
M.D. Ala. · 1994 · confidence medium
Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Serv., Inc., 982 F.2d 472, 473 (11th Cir.1993).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Marilyn M. Mulhall v. Advance Security, Inc., Figgie International, Inc.
11th Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
Co., 983 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir.1993); Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Serv., Inc., 982 F.2d 472, 473-74 (11th Cir.1993).
cited Cited as authority (rule) O'Neal v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.
W.D.N.Y. · 1994 · confidence medium
Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Service, Inc., 982 F.2d 472, 473 (11th Cir.1993).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Underwood v. City of Fort Myers
M.D. Fla. · 1993 · confidence medium
Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Service, Inc., 982 F.2d 472, 473 (11th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) 62 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 769, 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,642 Delphine Edwards Goldsmith v. City of Atmore Howard Shell, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Mayor of City of Atmore, Alabama
11th Cir. · 1993 · confidence medium
More recently, this Court concluded that "the reasoning of Baynes ... compels the conclusion that the same provisions of the Act involved in Baynes are not retroactively applicable to cases ... which were pending but had not resulted in final judgment as of the effective date of the Act." Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Service, Inc., 982 F.2d 472, 473-74 (11th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Goldsmith v. City of Atmore
11th Cir. · 1993 · confidence medium
More recently, this Court concluded that “the reasoning of Baynes ... compels the conclusion that the same provisions of the Act involved in Baynes are not retroactively applicable to cases .... which were pending but had not resulted in final judgment as of the effective date of the Act.” Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Service, Inc., 982 F.2d 472, 473-74 (11th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Wrensen v. City of New York
S.D.N.Y. · 1993 · confidence medium
Co., 963 F.2d 929, 940 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 207 , 121 L.Ed.2d 148 (1992); Fray v. The Omaha World Herald Co., 960 F.2d 1370, 1378 (8th Cir.1992); Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Svcs, Inc., 982 F.2d 472, 473-74 (11th Cir.1993) (extending ruling in Baynes v. AT & T Technologies, Inc., 976 F.2d 1370, 1375 (11th Cir.1992)).
discussed Cited "see" Becky Wallace, Annette Neal v. Dunn Construction Company, Inc.
11th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Service, Inc., 982 F.2d 472, 473-74 (11th Cir.1993) (Civil Rights Act of 1991 does not apply retroactively). 8 .We join the Fifth Circuit in concluding ’ that "the pertinent inquiry, except in refusal-to-hire cases, is whether the employee would have been fired upon discovery of the wrongdoing, not whether he would have been hired in the first instance.” Kinetic Concepts, Inc., 49 F.3d at 1108.
cited Cited "see" Plaisance v. Travelers Insurance
N.D. Ga. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Service, Inc., 982 F.2d 472 (11th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited "see" Adams v. St. Lucie County Sheriff's Department
11th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Garner, 471 U.S. at 15 , 105 S.Ct. at 1703 (recognizing that common law prohibited the use of deadly force to apprehend a misdemeanant). 4 In this en banc case, the majority holds that at the time of this incident, the law was not clearly established that law enforcement officers would violate the constitutional rights of a fleeing misdemeanant if, during a high speed chase, the law enforcement officers intentionally rammed the automobile in which a misdemeanant and passenger were riding, thereby causing it to crash, killing the passenger. ** 5 For all of the reasons expressed in the panel…
cited Cited "see" Cohen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
D.N.H. · 1993 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Service, Inc., 982 F.2d 472 (11th Cir.1993). 5 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert Jeff Adams, Sr., Personal Representative for the Estate of Donald Demasco Adams, Sr.
v.
St. Lucie County Sheriff's Department, Robert C. Knowles, Sheriff, Donnie Ingram, J.M. Lindsey, Robert Soesbe
91-5137.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Jan 21, 1993.
982 F.2d 472
Published

982 F.2d 472

Robert Jeff ADAMS, Sr., Personal Representative for the
Estate of Donald Demasco Adams, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ST. LUCIE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Robert C. Knowles,
Sheriff, Donnie Ingram, Defendants,
J.M. Lindsey, Robert Soesbe, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 91-5137.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 21, 1993.

Julius F. Parker, Jr., Tallahassee, FL, for defendants-appellants.

Evan I. Fetterman & Assoc., Salvatore Scibetta, North Palm Beach, FL, for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Lenore Carrero Nesbitt, Judge.

PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 15, 1992, 11th Cir., 1992, 962 F.2d 1563)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.[*]

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

*

Senior U.S. Circuit Judge James C. Hill has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c)