Wright v. Fin. Serv. Of Norwalk, 996 F.2d 827 (6th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Wright v. Fin. Serv. Of Norwalk, 996 F.2d 827 (6th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Tremaine Johnson (ca6, 2015-09-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Tremaine Johnson
6th Cir. · 2015 · confidence medium
United States v. Alt, 996 F.2d 827, 829 (6th Cir.1993).
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Ahee
6th Cir. · 2001 · confidence medium
United States v. Alt, 996 F.2d 827, 829 (6th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Gold Unlimited, Inc. (2×)
6th Cir. · 1999 · confidence medium
P. 52(b); United States v. Alt, 996 F.2d 827, 829 (6th Cir.1993) (reviewing forfeited Sandstrom claim under plain error standard on appeal).
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. William J. Alt, M.D. Rosalinda Alt Karen Alt Robert W. Alt, William J. Alt, M.D.
6th Cir. · 1996 · confidence medium
United States v. Alt, 996 F.2d 827, 828-830 (6th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. John C. Sheffey (2×)
6th Cir. · 1995 · confidence medium
United States v. Alt, 996 F.2d 827, 829 (6th Cir.1993) (failing to find an error harmless where evidence was less than overwhelming).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Guy Leonard Prince v. United States
6th Cir. · 1995 · confidence medium
See, e.g., United States v. Pierce, 17 F.3d 146, 150 (6th Cir.1994); United States v. Alt, 996 F.2d 827, 830 (6th Cir.1993); United States v. Guardino, 972 F.2d 682, 686 (6th Cir.1992); United States v. Chambers, 944 F.2d 1253, 1269 (6th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1112 , 112 S.Ct. 1217 , 117 L.Ed.2d 455 and — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 1680 , 118 L.Ed.2d 397 (1992); United States v. Barger, 931 F.2d 359, 364 (6th Cir.1991); United States v. Sloman, 909 F.2d 176, 182-83 (6th Cir.1990).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Jaime Giraldo v. United States
6th Cir. · 1993 · confidence medium
See Gozlon-Peretz v. United States, 498 U.S. 395, 404-10 (1991); United States v. Alt, 996 F.2d 827, 830 (6th Cir.1993); United States v. Osborne, 931 F.2d 1139, 1144-46 (7th Cir.1991).
cited Cited "see" Alt v. Commissioner
6th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Alt, 996 F.2d 827 (6th Cir.1993), and United States v. Alt, 83 F.3d 779 (6th Cir.1996), for a more detailed history of the tax deficiencies at issue in this case.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Larry T. Tarwater (2×)
6th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Alt, 996 F.2d 827, 829 (6th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 872 , 117 S.Ct. 188 , 136 L.Ed.2d 126 (1996) (holding in a tax evasion case that a jury instruction shifting the burden of proof regarding a taxpayer’s knowledge of the tax code was not harmless error).
cited Cited "see" In Re Nan Beth Alt, Debtor. Nan Beth Alt v. United States
6th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Alt, 996 F.2d 827 (6th Cir.1993).
cited Cited "see" Betty Wright, Cross-Appellee v. Finance Service of Norwalk, Inc., Cross-Appellant
6th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
SEE 996 F.2d 827 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Betty Wright, of the Estate of Gladys Finch, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee
v.
Finance Service of Norwalk, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
92-3004.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Sep 15, 1993.
996 F.2d 827
Published

996 F.2d 827

Betty WRIGHT, Executrix of the Estate of Gladys Finch,
Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
FINANCE SERVICE OF NORWALK, INC., Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 91-4156, 92-3004.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 15, 1993.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge, and KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

[*~827]1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

[*~828]3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

[*~829]4

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.