United States v. Dewayne Melton, 1 F.3d 1235 (4th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Dewayne Melton, 1 F.3d 1235 (4th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jarno v. Department of Homeland Security (vaed, 2005-04-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Jarno v. Department of Homeland Security
E.D. Va. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Young v. Central Intelligence Agency, 1 F.3d 1235 , 1993 WL 305970, at *3 (4th Cir.1993) (quoting Rep.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jones
unknown court · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Haley, 784 F.2d at 1219 ; see also United States v. Smith, 1 F.3d 1235 , No. 92-5651, 1993 WL 290897, at *1-2 (4th Cir. (N.C.) July 29, 1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1078 , 127 L.Ed.2d 395 (1994) (citing United States v. Moore, 931 F.2d 245 ; United States v. Haley, 784 F.2d at 1219 (noting that even where the government admits that it would not be prejudiced by a withdrawal of a guilty plea, the defendant must still show a fair and just reason for the modification before a court should examine its propriety)); Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(e).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Dewayne Melton
93-6445.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Aug 4, 1993.
1 F.3d 1235
Unpublished

1 F.3d 1235

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DeWayne MELTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-6445.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 16, 1993.
Decided: August 4, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-84-187-G)

Dewayne Melton, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert H. Edmunds, Jr., United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Dewayne Melton noted this appeal outside the sixty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED