Wood v. Mgmt., 14 F.3d 45 (1st Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Wood v. Mgmt., 14 F.3d 45 (1st Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. One Parcel of Real Property With Buildings (rid, 1999-01-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. One Parcel of Real Property With Buildings
D.R.I. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. One Urban Lot, 14 F.3d 45 (Table), 1994 WL 9790 , *3 (1st Cir.1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. 4323 Bellwood Circle, Atlanta, Georgia 30349
N.D. Ga. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Varrone, 554 F.3d 327, 329-30, 332-33 (2d Cir.2009) (noting that the district court “found that the assets identified [were] properly traceable to the crime, because [t]he Citibank account was used by Castello to conduct his check cashing business [in violation of § 5313 and § 5322(a)], and the Government has submitted more than sufficient evidence demonstrating that the funds in that account were used in construction of [the property,]” and rejecting the defendant's argument that § 5317(c)(1)(A) only authorizes forfeiture of the instrumentalities of a crime,…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wood
v.
Management
93-1437.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Dec 8, 1993.
14 F.3d 45
Unpublished

14 F.3d 45

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
Jessica D. WOOD, Plaintiff, Appellee,
v.
MANAGEMENT SEARCH CORPORATION, Defendant, Appellee.

No. 93-1437.

United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.

December 8, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Jessica D. Wood on brief pro se.

Debra I. Lerner and Long, Racicot & Bourgeois on brief for appellee.

D.Mass.

AFFIRMED

Before Cyr, Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

1

Plaintiff Jessica D. Wood appeals the dismissal of her Title VII claim as not timely filed. We find no error and affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum and order dated March 17, 1993. Wood admittedly received the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's determination and 90-day right-to-sue notice on September 21, 1990. This complaint was filed 91 days later, on December 21, 1990. Compliance with the Title VII time for filing a federal suit, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-5(f)(1), is a statutory prerequisite: a complaint must be filed within 90 days of receipt of the EEOC right-to-sue letter. "In the absence of a recognized equitable consideration, the court cannot extend the limitation period by even one day." Rice v. New England College, 676 F.2d 9, 11 (1st Cir. 1982); see also Peete v. American Standard Graphic, 885 F.2d 331, 331-32 (6th Cir. 1989); Harvey v. New Bern Police Dep't., 813 F.2d 652, 653 (4th Cir. 1987); Mosel v. Hills Dep't. Store, Inc., 789 F.2d 251, 252 (3d Cir. 1986). As Wood does not claim that she had insufficient time within which to act, and no equitable reasons are presented to warrant disregarding the 90-day rule, the district court correctly dismissed the complaint as untimely.

2

Affirmed.