Major Saxton, Jr. v. CSX Transp., 239 F.3d 1209 (11th Cir. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Major Saxton, Jr. v. CSX Transp., 239 F.3d 1209 (11th Cir. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: James Johnson v. K Mart Corporation (ca11, 2001-12-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" James Johnson v. K Mart Corporation (2×)
11th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See 239 F.3d at 1215.
cited Cited "see" James Johnson v. K-Mart Corporation
11th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See 239 F.3d at 1215.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Henry Canales-Matamoros v. U.S. Attorney General
11th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Saxton v. ACF Indus., 239 F.3d 1209 , 1215 (11th Cir.2001) (noting “that holding [of the earlier panel] is the law of this Circuit regardless of what might have happened had other arguments been made to the panel that decided the issue first”) (citation omitted).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Azeez P. Adedutan v. Victory Vascular
11th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Saxton v. ACF Indus., 239 F.3d 1209 , 1215 (11th Cir.2001) ("that holding [of the earlier panel] is the law of this Circuit regardless of what might have happened had other arguments been made to the panel that decided the issue first") (citation omitted); Smith v. GTE Corp., 236 F.3d 1292 , 1302-03 (11th Cir.2001) (categorically rejecting an "overlooked reason” exception to the prior precedent rule); Turner v. Beneficial Corp., 236 F.3d 643 , 650 (11th Cir.2000) ("Nor is the operation of the rule dependent upon the skill of the attorneys or wisdom of the judges involved with the …
Major Saxton, Jr.
v.
CSX Transportation
00-11047.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Jan 24, 2001.
239 F.3d 1209
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 83%
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________________

No. 00-11047 ________________________________

D.C. Docket No. 98-01719-CV-N-S

MAJOR SAXTON, JR., MARY SAXTON, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus

ACF INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _________________________________________________________________

(Opinion January 24, 2001, 239 F.3d . 1209, 11th Cir., 2001)

(March 15, 2001)

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion

of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.