Carson Harbor Vill., Ltd. v. Unocal Corp., 240 F.3d 841 (9th Cir. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Carson Harbor Vill., Ltd. v. Unocal Corp., 240 F.3d 841 (9th Cir. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 7× by 7 distinct cases · “Evidence of threatened loss of prospective customers or goodwill certainly supports a finding of the possibility of irreparable harm.”
8 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sym-Agro, Inc. v. Seipasa, S.A. (ord, 2021-05-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Sym-Agro, Inc. v. Seipasa, S.A.
D. Or. · 2021 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
evidence of threatened loss of prospective customers or goodwill certainly supports a finding of the possibility of irreparable harm.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) LeTip World Franchise LLC v. Long Island Social Media Group LLC
D. Ariz. · 2024 · confidence medium
However, “[e]vidence of threatened 28 loss of prospective customers or goodwill certainly supports a finding of the possibility of 1 irreparable harm.” Stuhlbarg Int’l Sales Co., 240 F.3d at 841. 2 Here, Defendants’ creation of a new business venture in the same geographic 3 territory seeking the same customers as Plaintiff caused irreparable harm.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) LeTip World Franchise LLC v. Long Island Social Media Group LLC
D. Ariz. · 2024 · confidence medium
However, “[e]vidence of threatened 6 loss of prospective customers or goodwill certainly supports a finding of the possibility of 7 irreparable harm.” Stuhlbarg Int’l Sales Co., 240 F.3d at 841. 8 Here, Defendants’ creation of a new business venture in the same geographic 9 territory seeking the same customers as Plaintiff is causing irreparable harm.
cited Cited as authority (rule) ReBath LLC v. Foothills Service Solutions Company
D. Ariz. · 2021 · confidence medium
Stuhlbarg, 240 F.3d at 841; Athleta, Inc. v. Pitbull Clothing Co., Inc., 2013 WL 10 142877, *10 (C.D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jain v. Unilodgers, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Rent–A– 21 Center, Inc. v. Canyon Television & Appliance Rental, Inc., 944 F.2d 597, 603 (9th Cir. 1991). 22 Nevertheless, “intangible injuries, such as damage to ongoing recruitment efforts and goodwill, 23 qualify as irreparable harm.” Id.; see also Stuhlbarg Int'l Sales Co., 240 F.3d at 841.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carson Harbor Village, Ltd., a Limited Partnership Dba Carson Harbor Village Mobilhome Park, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant
v.
Unocal Corporation, a Delaware Corp., Defendant-Cross-Defendant, and City of Carson, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Crossclaimant-Appellee
98-55056.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Feb 13, 2001.
240 F.3d 841
Published
9 passages pin-cited by 16 cases
Pinpoint authority: #3,619 of 633,719
Citer courts: D. Oregon (5) · D. Arizona (3) · N.D. California (2) · E.D. California (1) · S.D. California (1) · D. Idaho (1) · W.D. Missouri (1)

240 F.3d 841 (9th Cir. 2001)

CARSON HARBOR VILLAGE, Ltd., a limited partnership dba Carson Harbor Village Mobilhome Park, Plaintiff-counter-defendant Appellant,
v.
UNOCAL CORPORATION, a DELAWARE CORP., Defendant-cross-defendant,
and
CITY OF CARSON, Defendant-cross-defendant-crossclaimant-Appellee.

Nos. 98-55056 98-55210 98-55213 98-55215 98-55422

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

February 13, 2001

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court[1] it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Notes:

1

Judge Wardlaw was recused