United States v. Hammoud, 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Hammoud, 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
123 citation events (123 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Linder (ca4, 2009-03-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Linder
4th Cir. · 2009 · confidence medium
United States v. Hammoud, 378 F.3d 426, 426 (4th Cir.2004), vacated, 543 U.S. 1097 , 125 S.Ct. 1051 , 160 L.Ed.2d 997 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Caro
W.D. Va. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hammoud, 378 F.3d 426, 426 (4th Cir.2004) (advising courts, to announce an alternative sentence, under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a), treating the guidelines as advisory only), judgment vacated and remanded, 543 U.S. 1097 , 125 S.Ct. 1051 , 160 L.Ed.2d 997 (2005). .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Erasto Gomez-Jimenez (2×)
4th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hammoud, 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir. 2004), vacated 543 U.S. 1097 (2005); see also Montes-Flores, 736 F.3d at 374 & n.4 (Shedd, J., dissenting).
examined Cited "see" United States v. Erasto Gomez-Jimenez (3×)
4th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hammoud, 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir. 2004), vacated 543 U.S. 1097 (2005); see also Montes-Flores, 736 F.3d at 374 & n. 4 (Shedd, J., dissenting).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Alvarado Perez (2×)
4th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hammoud, 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir.2004) (en banc order holding that the sentencing guidelines are mandatory but recommending that district courts impose alternate sentences treating the guidelines as advisory pending Supreme Court guidance), vacated, 543 U.S. 1097 , 125 S.Ct. 1051 , 160 L.Ed.2d 997 (2005) (for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)). .
cited Cited "see" Robinson v. United States
E.D. Mich. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hammond, 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir.2004) (en banc); United States v. Mincey, 380 F.3d 102 (2d Cir.2004); United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464 (5th Cir.2004).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Parris
4th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hammoud, 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir.2004) (order), petition for cert. filed, 73 U.S.L.W. 3121 , - U.S. -, - S.Ct. -, - L.Ed.2d -, 2004 WL 2153053 (U.S. Aug. 6, 2004) (No. 04-193), and 381 F.3d 316 (4th Cir.2004).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Salazar-Acuna
4th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hammond, 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir.2004) (order), petition for cert. filed, — U.S. —; — S.Ct. —, — L.Ed.2d — (U.S. Aug. 6, 2004) (No. 04-193).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Phillips
4th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hammoud, 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir.2004) (order), petition for cert. filed, — U.S.L.W. —, — S.Ct. —, — L.Ed.2d —(U.S. Aug. 6, 2004) (No. 04-193).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Hammoud (2×)
4th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hammoud, 378 F.3d 426 , 2004 WL 1730309 (4th Cir. August 2, 2004).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Hammoud (2×)
4th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hammoud, 378 F.3d 426 , 2004 WL 1730309 (4th Cir. August 2, 2004).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Musleh
4th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir.2004) ("In the interest of judicial economy, however, and pending a definitive ruling by the Supreme Court, we recommend that district courts within the Fourth Circuit also announce, at the time of sentencing, a sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553 (a) (West & Supp.2004), treating the guidelines as advisory only.”).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Johnson (2×)
S.D.W. Va · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. v. Hammond, 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir.2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Marco D. Duncan
11th Cir. · 2004 · signal: compare · confidence low
The portion of the footnote in Curtis addressing the second prong states in full: With respect to the second prong, we cannot conclude that it is obvious from Blakely that it applies to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines; there is considerable disagreement amongst jurists and amongst the circuits: compare United States v. Booker, 375 F.3d 508 (7th Cir.2004) (2-1 decision)(holding that Blakely applies to sentences imposed under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines over a dissent by Judge Easterbrook espousing the opposing view), United States v. Ameline, 376 F.3d 967 (9th Cir.2004) (2-1 decision) (…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Curtis
11th Cir. · 2004 · signal: compare · confidence low
With respect to the second prong, we cannot conclude that it is obvious from Blakely that it applies to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines; there is considerable disagreement amongst jurists and amongst the circuits: compare United States v. Booker, 375 F.3d 508 (7th Cir.2004) (2-1 decision) (holding that Blakely applies to sentences imposed under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines over a dissent by Judge Easterbrook espousing the opposing view), United States v. Ameline, 376 F.3d 967 , 2004 WL 1635808 (9th Cir. July 21, 2004) (2-1 decision) (holding that Blakely applies to sentences imposed und…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Mohamad Youssef Hammoud, A/K/A Ali Albousaleh, A/K/A Ali Abousaleh, Center for Constitutional Rights National Coalition to Protect Political Freedom National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers National Lawyers Guild, Amici Supporting
03-4253.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Aug 2, 2004.
378 F.3d 426
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

378 F.3d 426

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Mohamad Youssef HAMMOUD, a/k/a Ali Albousaleh, a/k/a Ali Abousaleh, Defendant-Appellant,
Center for Constitutional Rights; National Coalition to Protect Political Freedom; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; National Lawyers Guild, Amici Supporting Appellant.

No. 03-4253.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

August 2, 2004.

[*~426]1

Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Robert James Conrad, Jr., Douglas Scott Broyles, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Charlotte, NC, Demetra Daniel Lambros, John F. DePue, Anthony Steven Murry, Martha Rubio, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Kenneth Davis Bell, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, Charlotte, NC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

2

James Patrick McLoughlin, Jr., James William Haldin, Moore & Van Allen, Charlotte, NC, Stanley Lewis Cohen, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellant.

[*~427]3

Nancy Chang, Shayana Devendra Kadidal, Center for Constitutional Rights, New York, NY, David Douglas Cole, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, for Amici Supporting Appellant.

ORDER

4

After oral argument was heard by a panel of judges, a majority of the judges in active service voted to hear this appeal en banc. The en banc court heard argument on the matter on August 2, 2004.

[*~430]5

According to the vote of a majority of the en banc court constituted to hear this appeal, we affirm the judgment and hold that Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), does not operate to invalidate Hammoud's sentence under the federal Sentencing Guidelines. Therefore, district courts within the Fourth Circuit are hereby instructed to continue sentencing defendants in accordance with the guidelines, as was the practice before Blakely. In the interest of judicial economy, however, and pending a definitive ruling by the Supreme Court, we recommend that district courts within the Fourth Circuit also announce, at the time of sentencing, a sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp.2004), treating the guidelines as advisory only.

6

Majority and dissenting opinions will follow in due course.

[*~431]7

Entered at the direction of Chief Judge Wilkins, with the concurrence of the court.