Falin v. Shalala, 6 F.3d 207 (4th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Falin v. Shalala, 6 F.3d 207 (4th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Brown v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (ca1, 1995-01-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Brown v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
1st Cir. · 1995 · confidence medium
Falin, 6 F.3d at 207.
discussed Cited "see" Ricardo Thomas v. Atty Gen USA
3rd Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Singh v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 144, 152 (3d Cir. 2004) (“Taylor’s analysis can be readily imported here, because 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43) is similar to 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e) in that it too enumerates offenses, conviction of which places an alien in the category of ‘aggravated felon.’”). 6 F.3d at 207; Garcia, 462 F.3d at 293 n.9.
cited Cited "see" Noble v. Shalala
D. Colo. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Falin v. Sullivan, 776 F.Supp. 1097, 1100 (E.D.Va.1991), aff'd, 6 F.3d 207 (4th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1551 , 128 L.Ed.2d 200 (1994).
examined Cited "see" Teral Champion v. Donna E. Shalala, Department of Health and Human Services Charles M. Palmer, Director of Iowa Department of Human Services (4×)
8th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Falin v. Sullivan, 776 F.Supp. 1097, 1101 (E.D.Va.1991), aff'd per curiam, 6 F.3d 207 (4th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1551 , 128 L.Ed.2d 200 (1994); but see Hazard v. Sullivan, 827 F.Supp. 1348, 1352-53 (M.D.Tenn.1993), appeal filed, No. 93-6214 (6th Cir. Sept. 10, 1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hazard v. Shalala
6th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Falin v. Sullivan, 776 F.Supp. 1097, 1101 (E.D.Va.1991) (“nothing requires the Secretary of HHS to adjust upwardly automobile equity limits in response to inflation”), aff'd, 6 F.3d 207 (4th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1551 , 128 L.Ed.2d 200 (1994); Frederick, 862 F.Supp. at 42 (“The statute, 42 U.S.C. § 602 (a)(7)(B)®, which directed the Secretary to create the exclusion, places no duty upon the Secretary to periodically adjust the limit.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hazard v. Shalala
6th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Falin v. Sullivan, 776 F.Supp. 1097, 1101 (E.D.Va.1991) ("nothing requires the Secretary of HHS to adjust upwardly automobile equity limits in response to inflation"), aff'd, 6 F.3d 207 (4th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1551 , 128 L.Ed.2d 200 (1994); Frederick, 862 F.Supp. at 42 ("The statute, 42 U.S.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Norma R. Falin
v.
Donna Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services Larry Jackson, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Social Services
91-2386.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Sep 30, 1993.
6 F.3d 207
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

6 F.3d 207

Norma R. FALIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Donna SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services;
Larry Jackson, in his official capacity as
Commissioner of the Virginia Department
of Social Services,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-2386.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 5, 1992.
Decided Sept. 30, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond; James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-91-196-R).

Martin Douglas Wegbreit, Client Centered Legal Services of Southwest Virginia, Inc., Castlewood, VA, argued, for appellant.

William Markley Reinhart, Asst. Regional Counsel, Office of the Gen. Counsel, Dept. of Health & Human Services, Philadelphia, PA, argued (Eileen Bradley, Chief Counsel, Region III, Michael Leonard, Supervisory Asst. Regional Counsel, Office of the Gen. Counsel, Dept. of Health & Human Services, Philadelphia, PA, Debra J. Prillaman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Richmond, VA, on brief), for Federal appellee.

Pamela M. Reed, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, argued (Mary Sue Terry, Atty. Gen. of Va., on brief), for State appellee.

Before WIDENER, Circuit Judge, SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge, and KAUFMAN, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

We have considered the record in this case, the briefs of the parties and oral argument and are of opinion that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed.

2

Accordingly, we affirm on the well-reasoned opinion of the district court. Falin v. Sullivan, 776 F.Supp. 1097 (E.D.Va.1991).

3

AFFIRMED.