At page 207 Comparing statutory enumeration of offenses for alien crimes2 citing cases
- Brown v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 46 F.3d 102 (1st Cir. 1995).publishedFalin, 6 F.3d at 207.
- Ricardo Thomas v. Atty Gen USA, No. 11-1749 (3d Cir. Mar. 7, 2012).unpublishedSee Singh v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 144, 152 (3d Cir. 2004) (“Taylor’s analysis can be readily imported here, because 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43) is similar to 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e) in that it too enumerates offenses, conviction of which places an a…
Other citing cases
- Noble v. Shalala, 870 F. Supp. 304 (D. Colo. 1994).published
- Teral Champion v. Donna E. Shalala, 33 F.3d 963 (8th Cir. 1994).published
- Hazard v. Shalala, 44 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 1995).published
- Hazard v. Shalala, 44 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 1995).published
v.
Donna Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services Larry Jackson, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Social Services
Norma R. FALIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Donna SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services;
Larry Jackson, in his official capacity as
Commissioner of the Virginia Department
of Social Services,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-2386.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Argued May 5, 1992.
Decided Sept. 30, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond; James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-91-196-R).
Martin Douglas Wegbreit, Client Centered Legal Services of Southwest Virginia, Inc., Castlewood, VA, argued, for appellant.
William Markley Reinhart, Asst. Regional Counsel, Office of the Gen. Counsel, Dept. of Health & Human Services, Philadelphia, PA, argued (Eileen Bradley, Chief Counsel, Region III, Michael Leonard, Supervisory Asst. Regional Counsel, Office of the Gen. Counsel, Dept. of Health & Human Services, Philadelphia, PA, Debra J. Prillaman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Richmond, VA, on brief), for Federal appellee.
Pamela M. Reed, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, argued (Mary Sue Terry, Atty. Gen. of Va., on brief), for State appellee.
Before WIDENER, Circuit Judge, SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge, and KAUFMAN, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
We have considered the record in this case, the briefs of the parties and oral argument and are of opinion that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed.
Accordingly, we affirm on the well-reasoned opinion of the district court. Falin v. Sullivan, 776 F.Supp. 1097 (E.D.Va.1991).
AFFIRMED.