George J. Douglas v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 64 F.3d 662 (6th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
George J. Douglas v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 64 F.3d 662 (6th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Comer v. Commissioner of Social Security (ohnd, 2023-12-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Comer v. Commissioner of Social Security
N.D. Ohio · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bishop v. Shalala, 64 F.3d 662 (Table), No. 94-5375, [published in full-text format at 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24624 , at *5-7] (6th Cir. Aug. 15, 1995) (finding that 6,100 jobs nationally constituted a significant number); Lewis v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 94-1807, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6078 , at *3-4 (6th Cir. Mar. 22, 1995) (14,000 national jobs); Nash v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 94-5376, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15129 , at *7 (6th Cir. June 15, 1995) (70,000 national jobs); Borgerson v. Comm’r of Soc.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." DeGidio v. West Group Corp.
N.D. Ohio · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
Burke, 871 F.2d at 596 ; see also Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Olymco, Inc., 64 F.3d 662 1995 WL 499466, at *1 (6th Cir. Aug.21, 1995) (affirming decision in which district court assessed date of claim of distinctiveness as arising from defendant’s first use).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
George J. Douglas
v.
Commissioner of Social Security
94-5895.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Aug 10, 1995.
64 F.3d 662
Unpublished

64 F.3d 662

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
George J. DOUGLAS, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 94-5895.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 10, 1995.

Before: KEITH, RYAN and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

On appeal from a judgment of the district court affirming the decision of the Secretary,

2

This cause came on to be heard on the record compiled before the Secretary, the record of district court proceedings and briefs and oral argument of the parties. Upon due consideration thereof the court concludes that the findings and decision of the Secretary are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.

3

It is therefore ORDERED that the judgment of the district court in this case be and it hereby is affirmed.