green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Earl Davis
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Haskell v. Harris, 669 F.3d 1049, 1062 (9th Cir.2012), reh’g en banc granted, 686 F.3d 1121 (2012) (upholding California law requiring police to collect DNA samples from all adult felony arrestees and citing the government’s four “key interests”: “identifying arrestees, solving past crimes, preventing future crimes, and exonerating the innocent”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard STENGEL; Mary Lou Stengel, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MEDTRONIC INCORPORATED, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
v.
MEDTRONIC INCORPORATED, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
10-17755.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jul 25, 2012.
Thomas G. Cotter, Haralson Miller Pitt Feldman & McAnally, PLC, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., Michael Kevin Brown and Lisa Marie Baird, Reed Smith, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, and Timothy James Casey, Esquire, Litigation Counsel, Schmitt, Schneck, Smyth & Herrod PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellee.
Kozinski.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be dted as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
[*1122] Judges Wardlaw, Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote as to whether the case should be taken en banc.