green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1928 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1928
1977
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Shere v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson, 498 So.2d at 909 (Fla. 1986) (emphasis supplied); see also Dudley, 545 So.2d at 857 (error to call non-eyewitness as court witness to introduce prior inconsistent statements about what he overheard); Brumbley, 453 So.2d at 384 (no error calling as court witness a participant/eyewitness to the criminal transaction); Olive, 131 Fla. at 548 , 179 So. at 811 (no error calling eyewitness as a court witness); Morris, 100 Fla. at 850 , 130 So. at 582 (same); Brown, 91 Fla. at 682, 108 So. at 842 (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Wolcoff v. State
See Brown v. State, 91 Fla. 682 , 108 So. 842, 845 (1926) (a court witness is a witness not called by the prosecution).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
W. H. Turner, Appellant,
v.
A. T. Shelfer, Appellee
v.
A. T. Shelfer, Appellee
Walter D. Payne and Garland Hale, for Appellant;
Leitner Leitner, for Appellee.
Whitfield, Terrell, Buford.
Published
Per Curiam.
— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court now being advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.