Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States, 282 U.S. 838 (1930).

Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States, 282 U.S. 838 (1930). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

neutral Cited (no substantive treatment) 0.4 score

6 citation events across 3 distinct courts.

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 6

Treatment by court

cc	0R/0Y/0G	3
idaho	0R/0Y/0G	2
cadc	0R/0Y/0G	1

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc.
v.
United States

No. 100.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct 13, 1930.

282 U.S. 838

51 S. Ct. 21

75 L. Ed. 745

1930 U.S. LEXIS 126

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Messrs. J. Marvin Haynes, Robert H. Montgomery, and Thomas G. Haight for petitioner. Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Rugg and Messrs. Claude R. Branch and Charles R. Pollard for the United States.

Cited by 1 opinion | Published

Petition for writ[*839] of certiorari to the Court of Claims denied.

Messrs. J. Marvin Haynes, Robert H. Montgomery, and Thomas G. Haight for petitioner. Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Rugg and Messrs. Claude R. Branch and Charles R. Pollard for the United States.