green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“the showing by the government must warrant a finding that the amount of the tax evaded is substantial”
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Andrew Tsanas
the showing by the government must warrant a finding that the amount of the tax evaded is substantial
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
David R. Jones v. United States of America, Willie L. Short, Jr. v. United States of America, Arthur L. Jones v. United States
KRAMER (Defense Counsel): I do not know what evidence was brought before the grand jury.' 33 Carrado v. United States, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 183, 188 , 210 F.2d 712 , cert. denied, 347 U.S. 1018 , 74 S.Ct. 874 , 98 L.Ed. 1140 (1954) 34 329 F.2d 848, 853 (1964) 35 See, e.g., United States v. Rosenburgh, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 580 , 19 L.Ed. 263 (1868); Nanfito v. United States, 20 F.2d 376 (8th Cir. 1927); Stewart v. United States, 300 F. 769 (8th Cir. 1924) 36 Supra note 33 37 Carrado v. United States, supra note 33; United States v. Nunan, 236 F.2d 576, 594 (2d Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 912 , 7…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mitchell
See United States v. Nunan, 236 F.2d 576 (2d Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 912 , 77 S.Ct. 661 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957); United States v. Weber, 197 F.2d 237 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 834 , 73 S.Ct. 42 , 97 L.Ed. 649 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dunham Concrete Products, Inc.
See United States v. Nunan, 236 F.2d 576 (2d Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 912 , 77 S.Ct. 661 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957); see also Lawn v. United States, 355 U.S. 339 , 78 S.Ct. 311 , 2 L.Ed.2d 321 (1958) (illegally obtained evidence); Coppedge v. United States, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 79 , 311 F.2d 128 (1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 946 , 83 S.Ct. 1541 , 10 L.Ed.2d 701 (1963) (perjured testimony).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis Rifkin
See United States v. Nunan, 236 F.2d 576, 586 (2d Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 912 , 77 S.Ct. 661 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957); Buttermore v. United States, 180 F.2d 853, 855 (6th Cir. 1950).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edwin Murray
See United States v. Nunan, 236 F.2d 576, 588 (2 Cir.1956), cert. denied 353 U.S. 912 , 77 S.Ct. 661 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
WKAT, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
See, for example, the discussion in Federal Communications Comm’n v. WOKO, 329 U.S. 223, 229 , 67 S.Ct. 213 , 91 L.Ed. 204 (1946). . 111 U.S.App.D.C. -, 295 F.2d 131 . . 64 Stat. 1129 , 1130. . 72 Stat. 951 . . 5 U.S.C.A. § 1037 (c). . 99 U.S.App.D.C. 199, 203-204 , 239 F.2d 19 , 23-24 (1956), certiorari denied, 353 U.S. 918 , 77 S.Ct. 664 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
Noe v. Federal Communications Commission
His Holiness Pope Pius XII, Encyclical Miranda Prorsus, September 8, 1957, para. 130; see id. para. 216. .
discussed
Cited "see"
Noe v. Federal Communications Commission
After argument, while both appeals were under advisement, the appeal of Times-Picayune was withdrawn, pursuant to an undertaking it had given to the Department of Justice in connection with an anti-trust problem, and was dismissed with the consent of the parties, by order of this court 2 The pertinent portion of the text of Section 310(a) recites: '(a) The station license required hereby shall not be granted to or held by-- '(1) Any alien or the representative of any alien; '(2) Any foreign government or the representative thereof; '(3) Any corporation organized under the laws of any foreign g…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McNamee v. Woodbury Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses
See also Farmer & Co. v. Hooks, 239 F.2d 547 (10th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 911 , 77 S. Ct. 669 , 1 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
James Wood, Cross v. Allen Worachek, Cross
See, e. g., Ginsburg v. Black, 237 F.2d 790 (7th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 911 , 77 S.Ct. 669 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fidelity Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Rko General, Inc., Intervenor
See also Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. FCC, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 13 , 189 F.2d 677 , cert. denied, 342 U.S. 830 , 72 S.Ct. 55 , 96 L.Ed. 628 (1951). 40 The court makes a rather extraordinary cite to McClatchy Broadcasting Co., 19 F.C.C. 343 , 380-81 (1954), aff'd McClatchy Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 195 , 239 F.2d 15 (1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 918 , 77 S.Ct. 662 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957) in which the Hearing Examiner relied on the so-called "autonomy" argument to reduce a diversification preference (although not to eliminate it).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
E. L. Farmer & Co.
v.
Hooks
v.
Hooks
No. 802.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 25, 1957.
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.