green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
General Electric Credit Corp. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.
See Delta Drilling Co. v. Arnett, 186 F.2d 481, 487-88 (6th Cir.1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 954 , 71 S.Ct. 574 , 95 L.Ed. 688 (1951). 19 *463 Because unknown owners and non-record claimants need not be joined for them to protect their interests in the mortgaged property, the first test set out in rule 19 for whether joinder is necessary is not satisfied.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trevor A. Waldron v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Id. at 596; see also Roldan v. Racette, 984 F.2d 85, 87-88 (2d Cir.1993) (collecting cases). 15 However, both Campillo and Fernandez-Collado explicitly drew a distinction from Chung Young Chew v. Boyd, 309 F.2d 857, 865 (9th Cir.1962) and Slavik v. Miller, 89 F.Supp. 575, 576 (W.D.Pa.), aff'd, 184 F.2d 575 (3d Cir.1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 955 , 71 S.Ct. 566 , 95 L.Ed. 688 (1951), two cases in which the INS was deemed to have "technical custody" over petitioners.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cole
v.
Loew's Incorporated
v.
Loew's Incorporated
No. 522.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 26, 1951.
Robert W. Kenny and Bartley C. Crum for petitioner. Irving M. Walker for respondent.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.