green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker Manufacturing, Inc. v. Hoffmann, Inc.
See Pure Foods, Inc. v. Minute Maid Corp., 214 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert. denied [,] 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954); Iowa Farmers Union v. Farmers’ Educational and Co-op Union, 247 F.2d 809 (8th Cir.1957); Lyon v. Quality Courts United, Inc., 249 F.2d 790 (6th Cir.1957); Drop Dead Co. v. S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James C. Payne
See United States v. Kafes, 214 F.2d 887, 890 (3d Cir.) (tax evasion offense not complete until defendant’s tax payment became due), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 887 , 75 S.Ct. 207 , 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gene Harris Travel Service, Inc. v. Harris Travel Service, Inc.
See Pure Foods, Inc. v. Minute Maid Corp., 214 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.) (defendant’s use of words “Minute Made” caused confusion and mistake on part of purchaser as to origin of defendant’s product), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
Libby v. City of Dillingham
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Seltenreich v. Town of Fairbanks, 103 F.Supp. 319 (D.Alaska 1952), aff'd, 211 F.2d 83 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 887 , 75 S.Ct. 206 , 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose F. Uriarte, United States of America v. Daniel Ramirez-Uriarte
United States v. Murray, 492 F.2d 178 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 854 , 95 S.Ct. 98 , 42 L.Ed.2d 87 (1974); see United States v. Witt, 215 F.2d 580 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 887 , 75 S.Ct. 207 , 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.
(2×)
See Pure Foods, Inc. v. Minute Maid Corp., 214 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954); Iowa Farmers Union v. Farmers’ Educational and Cooperative Union of America, 247 F.2d 809 (8th Cir. 1957); Lyon v. Quality Courts United, Inc., 249 F.2d 790 (6th Cir. 1957); Drop Dead Co. v. S. C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Franchised Stores of New York, Inc. And Thomas Carvel v. Martin Winter
See Pure Foods, Inc. v. Minute Maid Corp., 214 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954); Iowa Farmers Union v. Farmers’ Educational and Co-operative Union of America, 247 F.2d 809 (8th Cir. 1957); Lyon v. Quality Courts United, Inc., 249 F.2d 790 (6th Cir. 1957); Drop Dead Co. v. S. C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fancee Free Mfg. Co. v. Fancy Free Fashions, Inc.
See Pure Foods, Inc., v. Minute Maid Corp., 5 Cir., 214 F.2d 792 , certiorari denied 1954, 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 697 ; cf. Yale Electric Corp. v. Robertson, 2 Cir., 1928, 26 F.2d 972, 974 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carmelo Sansone
See United States v. Witt, 2 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 580, 583 , certiorari denied Talanker v. United States, 348 U.S. 887 , 75 S.Ct. 207 , 99 L.Ed. 697 ; United States v. Lekacos, 2 Cir., 1945, 151 F.2d 170, 172 , reversed on other grounds sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
T & L Computer Systems, Inc. v. Stanford
“It is clear that intrastate infringing use is within the provisions of the [Lanham] Act if it has a substantial economic effect upon interstate use by the mark’s owner.” Id. at 488 (quoting Lyon v. Quality Courts United, Inc., 249 F.2d 790 (6th Cir.1957)) (emphasis added); see also Pure Foods v. Minute Maid Corporation, 214 F.2d 792, 795 (5th Cir.) (declaring that a trademark registered under the Lanham Act is protected from infringement which is purely intrastate but which interferes with the free flow of interstate commerce or has a substantial effect on such commerce), cert. denied, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morrison v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Witt, 215 F.2d 580 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 348 U.S. 887 , 75 S.Ct. 207 , 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954); United States v. Polowichak, 783 F.2d 410 (4th Cir.1986); United States v. Callahan, 588 F.2d 1078 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 826 , 100 S.Ct. 49 , 62 L.Ed.2d 33 (1979); United States v. Gonzales, 424 F.2d 1055 (9th Cir. 1970); Nelson v. State, 257 Ark. 1 , 513 S.W.2d 496 (1974); Cheeks v. State, 266 Ind. 190 , 361 N.E.2d 906 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of San Antonio v. Aguilar
The governmental or legislative functions are assigned to the city council; the proprietary or ministerial functions, to the city manager. § 2; § 46(3); see Ostrom v. San Antonio, 94 Tex. 523 , 62 S.W. 909, 910 (1901); see also Seltenreich v. Fairbanks, 103 F.Supp. 319 (D.Alaska 1952), aff'd, 211 F.2d 83 (9th Cir.1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 887 , 75 S.Ct. 206 , 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954); Visone v. Reilly, 80 N.J.Super. 494 , 194 A.2d 248, 250 (1963); Welch v. City of Long Beach, 109 Cal.App.2d 561 , 241 P.2d 26, 28 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Philip A. Foley v. United States
See also, and compare United States v. Kafes, 3 Cir., 214 F.2d 887, 890, 891 , certiorari denied 348 U.S. 887 , 75 S.Ct. 207 , 99 L.Ed. 697 ; Lee v. United States, 9 Cir., 238 F.2d 341, 346 ; United States v. Jannuzzio, D.C.Del., 184 F.Supp. 460 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Talanker
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 388.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 22, 1954.
Samuel Mezansky for petitioner., Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.